From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41338: Toolbar-bug in Emacs 27.0.91/Pretest Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 15:37:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgfyel87.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87ftbzva1f.fsf@rub.de> <877dxb4hzh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878shrey7h.fsf@gmx.net> <874ksfexjr.fsf@gmx.net> <87wo5aemyc.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="16481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41338@debbugs.gnu.org, konrad.podczeck@univie.ac.at, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 15:38:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJUs-0004Bj-AF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 15:38:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJUr-00051q-5x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:38:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJUR-000516-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJUR-0006mG-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJUQ-0007vf-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: martin rudalics , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Juri Linkov , 41338@debbugs.gnu.org, Konrad Podczeck Original-Received: via spool by 41338-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41338.158972264730415 (code B ref 41338); Sun, 17 May 2020 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2020 13:37:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJTq-0007uU-M1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:39695) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJTo-0007uF-4c for 41338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:37:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1589722634; bh=/waPOGtoLojLlQ5CmCQXiBnl4dKCmD/a2PqWFiu5KFE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZmoTJD7W7IDWVI5+hTwAnx9BYtbzlmkrR+kuL9OPRcdZc24yLZT8+TiK7y/fFxzP+ azcLyqGVHMbd37V20L/w3+aSNlDqQtkKs+VF1XuOstOvCYtr4rrwG+DJz0T2oEK7Pd yTCcQv+sKLFkFUy1eF8eY+W0yJUXJjv6PAwjKxdQ= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobe-jhalfs ([188.109.150.40]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MJmGZ-1jKhV23LXF-00K8DQ; Sun, 17 May 2020 15:37:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 17 May 2020 16:12:38 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:E8C0UHSwSzcS+m1JnXqlZSehPzBy/bkLfUNIX2SGpDljo34mRuw nWafXDwOKPp5WPEkO57WHYUuG6IjC1wyPOBOdnJ6h9ovB/PKLWE1d+w1Q0B3jUg55Mxp1II dToy1uOSfGsospf7jZjyaUKOTdXoVNyg+egDSVBZ38jIt7tB5rZ0F4kRNlzTdnzPthnqvl8 /oJtnLf5hhE6VfXEcXpjA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WYhmxD14h2E=:MQhj8/CyYM+MVBgXKbeZga zUzqVmO5rQMflYAVctXdCF0DddxxI0w2hiTHZ7BJw1pbGDZPE2YHwI3vhdMaCUPj0ww6qtb1F KYw7CMBFRIHNxhfSmdJWS1bwuxKSfI1oQ3odCbJuCjVP7XuGT05bF5Pc8NPZyzaDPdL+7xbvh GwdNsSBuTA+pwo59Fm0MnsiQjQAuFsJTwdN7eXUM/nIgqlkHqsIXX0HUa/A9TZ4lO/UBy4wO6 fg5m9CZr5vlOEEKZGMB3VwGsmeiYlAI3v1Dip7BKZa1xs76ZvncB4mMe939MYS2NbQ3bj7veG BTJufnhuDoYMHfYz5tHvfEvcXAo6D9heAZ0n6wggIfBJHDt6xA/tSCyfCXOPNL6HNWOXJ1zXg y2k7AkwhCEF9s/cJF7xVn+Ui9BGbpTD9sOkAd5Xi/1bRMOOWPn5tzx4YtvopWHM2ICDH7WOoG 0gT2crlrAcb5Z9bsyLneSiottahzUhh1qUNkFbc/f/IRa314PRm6WKKrpYbOhH/o/2Mpe5zH2 9itS/zSQzUx8/T0FwPoF5/iuXOTwibYY4isjUewbisD/kGM2SOzv1K4cx1hxwPxHYEXycOkeT sY/NIZkOa7k1kDmF3pJ+AOwC1dAKfUEepZBTU8CljMXgAt2kE6KZH0bcg76NTcKonWrSsTE/b tqmJZJljquzfYxu0cPF7WIL0vS0Gt2lU6IcMBfrchRxDSwKNdKUCyGmzeek+f+0r8P3F7XaU/ ucmcImwj2+FdyVpMoTGoBGbjQF6bVg/O2HUmEkQF+voRlj6940uSv6B7VYj1CVP0rudDz6ft X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180460 Archived-At: On Sun, 17 May 2020 16:12:38 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On May 17, 2020 3:59:55 PM GMT+03:00, Stephen Berman wrote: >> The bug reported in the OP (the unexpected tool bar change) seems to >> be triggered by isearch (it was part of the OP's recipe and I haven't >> been able to reproduce it without using isearch), but maybe the >> observation about isearch I reported in my followup is a separate bug >> or perhaps no bug, even though it surprised me. >> >> Steve Berman > > So the problem is that the toolbar is not reconfigured to reflect the fa= ct > that we are in Isearch? In the OP the tool bar change was in the message-mode buffer, not the buffer where isearch was invoked. My additional observation was that in the latter buffer the tool bar and lighter indicated isearch in progress, but the overlays were missing and point was in its pre-isearch position. > Does it make sense to remain in Isearch in tbis scenario? Could it be > that we are over-engineering this stuff? As I reported in my followup to Martin, it is only when deleting the frame by clicking the toolkit's close frame button that isearch remains in progress, with `C-x 5 0' it is cancelled. So the former seems to be the problematic case, since it's also the method used in the OP. Steve Berman