From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10107: 23.2; Add command gud-quit Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:36:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg1sofyt.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8762icpcus.fsf@linux-4qi7.site> <1706399.zsAvlgfHB3@localhost.localdomain> <87k0n7uzcz.fsf@gnus.org> <2011306.fv05nxKMY0@localhost.localdomain> <87lf7nqhrk.fsf@gnus.org> <834kebi1y4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7ibqh36.fsf@gnus.org> <8335tvi1fa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 10107@debbugs.gnu.org, giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 08 11:38:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYBW-0000wt-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYBU-0001C7-SG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYAQ-0007zx-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYAQ-0008MI-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYAQ-0007O3-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10107.162314501528380 (code B ref 10107); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2021 09:36:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYAJ-0007Ng-I5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYAH-0007NR-PK for 10107@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:36:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6cqMPZd4UFOw3Z+ufn3+xMs6ANVgPIeJxw0h+TMzaqg=; b=QSWKMCZj2vQAEVKjQhjhr7IWep h5JoiudobWxN4kq8/aYmIcDZL0SdLBeOn0kzvtUezqzezrZyTYSE7AmuDS6dnvzgkBdZ9u0D+k6Ft w/3kt50o7dGS0gCoz6og6O9sGIdJtqH77LpJabvl8kEgYTEunAIU8aq+YeIEsm9yEPtI=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqYA7-0007ET-4R; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:36:47 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEVsdXsdFBTh08v/ //8dPTZQAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAlwSFlzAAALEgAACxIB0t1+/AAAAAd0SU1FB+UGCAkgL/Et 36oAAAFbSURBVCjPTdG9bsIwEAfwAxUJeaJRIiGmlgn5KRIEQzOFyNehT1DxFFEm5KkdWJiCpUru /yl751BElA//ch92HJoxE02YuSEifZQKN8LRI3IF39Kenh+Q0lT3GuaS0qsRTQJXcu0P7g5X0i3S yIl4g2Nugd0jtMZxkxA1cqiWcm9Cl2rKldy36NKklRkKPl7mE8H+bRsLrrOoKGg6zHibDVrjqL9O uPZgrdn0seIaUeDyjYl7wa+CjJcGH1ONcGlxKjRtJtglNJkdtIHBlXkBRF3VGq/sOttDGjjyPy7v jIemtb54zwfrQ9oqe26ziIum8WHN7SoGk9KqwMZgOCbwoqgt4meC+26WMosF7Znzr7wXACS/se2p g4dA9rwOp5cxEhtZsF8DQYB5UQMWehBwFuj7BJ0EYwNFxHiQFYRxHGjqC4vQjxiMfDaN7Ug+vJah 0fYELxH843RH+ANNCdcrFLJgDgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0wNi0wOFQwOTozMjo0 NyswMDowMK4UGs4AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDYtMDhUMDk6MzI6NDcrMDA6MDDf SaJyAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Mimi Goese and Ben Neill's _Life You Are_: "You4ia" In-Reply-To: <8335tvi1fa.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:10:33 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208213 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> delete-process is more general (works on all process-like things) and >> therefore seems more useful as a user-level command. > > But the OP wanted to kill only real subprocesses, no? The OP only wanted a command for gud buffers, but I think that if we want to have a command here, we should make it generally useful. And I don't see any downsides to using delete-process instead of kill-process here, but perhaps I'm overlooking something? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no