From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:19:19 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87sfyhj3qw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87mtoux1ha.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1f39aa34-6626-3d0b-d764-2c9908787d99@yandex.ru> <87o8998wf4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <84e4e2ef-6c8d-3645-9e1e-3129981dd45f@yandex.ru> <875yvgvohe.fsf@gnus.org> <87y28burzd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o896kt5k.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6609"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 50344@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 17:43:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGmN-0001bA-QA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:43:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGmM-0004eA-Rz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl1-0000TN-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl1-0001ss-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl1-0007Cs-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:42:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50344.163094291227657 (code B ref 50344); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:42:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2021 15:41:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGkp-0007C1-TN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43217) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGkm-0007BM-O5 for 50344@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03699E000A; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:41:40 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87o896kt5k.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:25:11 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213611 Archived-At: >>> Then it would be only on `B c' in vc-dir-mode? `C-x v s' isn't very >>> mnemonic, but would removing it from global map inconvenience people? >>> (I've never used it myself.) >> >> Indeed, it seems there is no way to remove old keybindings, especially >> by rebinding them to other commands, so I propose to add new keybindings: > > We do remove old keybindings if we think that makes sense. Like I said, > I've never used that command myself, ever, so I was wondering whether > that was generally the case. If we believe that it's a rarely used > binding, then we could indeed remove it (or use it for something else). > > (Especially since it seems quite un-mnemonic currently.) I don't know, if someone types a familiar key and it does something completely different...