From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] fix VC to find the responsible backend with the most specific path. Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfy7tl4r.fsf@elite.giraud> References: <877dfkxyt4.fsf@elite.giraud> <83y280cv8g.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtofvbnl.fsf@elite.giraud> <83h7encrq1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cc: 50572@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 14 14:09:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7FT-0002b0-My for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:09:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7FS-0002iX-Ji for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7FG-0002e5-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7FG-0002SH-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7FG-0005Ex-2h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Manuel Giraud Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50572.163162132020099 (code B ref 50572); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 12:08:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7Eu-0005E7-GY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:30366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ7Es-0005Dw-LO for 50572@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from elite.giraud ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cf21b569 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:08:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83h7encrq1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:38:14 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214301 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Manuel Giraud >> Cc: 50572@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:50:22 +0200 >>=20 >> > Isn't that already available with "C-u C-x v v"? >>=20 >> It does not work for me. It still tries to register in my homedir >> subversion. > > It didn't work for me, either. Which is a pity, since the manual says > it should. I guess we lost this at some point; patches to fix that > are welcome. Ok. I could try to work on this issue then but maybe I should file another bug report, no? >> FWIW, I think the most specific should be the default of >> "C-x v v" > > I'm worried that we are arbitrarily changing the defaults, for the > sole reason that the new default plays better with someone's > workflows. I think you are right and as you said the "choose the correct backend" behaviour is already documented in the manual (in "Advanced Control in =E2=80=98C-x v v=E2=80=99"). > AFAIR, it used to be the case that the order of VCS names in > vc-handled-backends determined the way the default is sought out and > set. This change (and I think the other one Dmitry mentioned in his > response?) change that in a way that doesn't leave any "fire escape" > to users who might be setting things up to have a meaningful (for > them) order in that list. Yes, in "Customizing VC", the manual insists on the order importance of the vc-handled-backends list. So maybe, just fixing "C-u C-x v v" and remember this customization is enough here. --=20 Manuel Giraud