Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think you are right. But we could create such an encoding, see > etc/charsets/ and the coding-system definitions to go with them. We could, but unfortunately, I'm not able to find any quality source for the charset. The closest I've been able to find is the file from IBM (attached), but it doesn't map to Unicode code points, of course: ... 90 LI610000 i Dotless Small 91 SD130000 Grave Accent 92 SD110000 Acute Accent glibc doesn't seem to have this, and I can't find it on the Unicode web site, either. So we'd have to maintain this by hand (and the easiest way is probably to copy the table from Wikipedia and massage it). But... it seems like an awful lot of work for something like this, so I think I'll bow out. If somebody else wants to implement this, that's totally OK, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no