From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:05:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87sfr66sb7.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87bkxu8k7t.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87bkxu8k7t.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wngiba3j.fsf@gnu.org> <874k3m8grb.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmauwtp.fsf@gmail.com> <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14606"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 15:08:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkbi-0003dP-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41728 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkbh-0005Qn-Cn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkZm-0002EQ-IC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkZm-0003lI-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkZl-0002xk-Ui for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54562.164821714911343 (code B ref 54562); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2022 14:05:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51959 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkZZ-0002wt-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic312-23.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.191.204]:44712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkZY-0002wg-0M for 54562@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:05:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1648217141; bh=vQO+OFRIMu3Ox4R6UuX8c/BcczPViJEY0L9foH9bkrg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=Q2/aVBe5LYe+Pq10iCqHAen7nTzQk8mQS8PNUr86L9rJaVMFJC0/+UqewnwZU1N33hY5YHmt2ST7QREXLYRB1eaOn44kgikm3Sa8iIn6NF9mwsNeB0KoACLbgs5M+cKnFgEdhNZfupGOa76qwmeAq1hKEVehSfLPl4FAmWi/T+K0XOEUuVhQzqTi/Krzp7iV0mShx/qTPPZNQuQyFX6EJfclSJdbxy75zZJ7R4l887Ll2FfAY9wPrWyPGdB6UEOcOkDaC2+o3jaXlOFuIk8lWyZ7uCb5PwxTFqR3i5TMbgqdeG2TD9HNyf2w+lBedgWAmsdxUOAUu0jt/yTfkQyQXg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1648217141; bh=IGcuMIESe/nNB5/5cRRl637NynvXXX3jJgomA10u07B=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=KAXm/u1pNg0amh+slwjcxi8FV7Gbe540Ym/PjGcDA7JUyQHYQ/o3m6yogFDPmUmyib2rkPF3bTKtU1kvamodO8pwhYAUoPKPmwTvUSI8TpWL/kAhqrCORZBhZoS3XGMGW8YmJFqyvAJ2sA2i0u/U57FQ2345/e/TFXuUa2l7G65fslTO8mzFu2UmAcz4XelZpRjZ3yZ4EFcaniVXtz92SVCUL3uOU9SdL0Jde66JpN0+iGkGeHU0hqv3PfLuleOza4k5hOaTPO5Zzbe1ogRS+R+G5mq1ibkof0WNsyso88JjBAViJ5wwi+dmvj2K8qC/ibrOa74uj3ewgPpUWf/PZg== X-YMail-OSG: _Mce9TUVM1lS8LchDRdtKdunFPm5bRzlLcNZHKFERJbiF3gKikkodTfjicCeyIr gDjoOHqLBQY8._cCcTefqzMZTpaHlo8veEf1RDGcANBUZCYrVz8w1sFY.DTEAKbkPXamOLhBoqm7 oL6llSK.hR_7FzUJNx6byazvwMi9_ae28B8ENOY3_mC2ta0zLtAMLK8HqavinyJGrf1PLPZbtz_J 3mNj6owmUvPuWMljd5N9NL7KKX4H1sdwMtQdFJ7hJVE0mYGsKB71f_y2AdeWMKVFS6EAAu6QAMXA 5BiyOWeyBrdhlcjIH9cf6BMYwntin3CqvukAWvXSrkQzKfacUn_3U3.4DXjI.IR0N76Rt3oGfeRd H2I.6kjaARYW5vfM2XFybLwPTy002tgcBaHU3dpAHvTO0gH9vBF.C7J4mmCd.vMJ1QeVkNG7LvLs VinHddn7INCxnwLdm_5zJ9bafmGJ5YO7_Gp.LFwQMko_TQHgI_558OuEdB1M5M7SfawhHgUNLTxw yQyUuFHVIZMLzqpDp6GvpYdDgQAwkR3TGDz4a3M9GXK7H9.8dtvkN.CFND4oKB.mtlq9B0VdAFLH E8sb4r7zahKBNLjZxJxtqzUoCcSwolbUz3Yyk.Hkt5nuxBvagt8DuxQZWyLTIJTHboZrLt0uPxgv jriy_tyMoqS8m15bjthV22K7fdju4oLDXHFnF81XErHHEUTG_ptHsIvWBD8iUsdJmlg_jD2MbXjP owu8wdSDnuu.ZkQQKDk4hkEaM9gPh092nAomW18Fd1as.Mm2rcrDWDQsSWPHnUJ8if996CHfmzuD x9Q4E.tgt5PuBxNEuMkhoAukcqtWbodPjxhT2MxYeK X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:05:41 +0000 Original-Received: by kubenode512.mail-prod1.omega.sg3.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7659f2b32cfb8f0497bab78747b48bcf; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:05:36 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:15:35 +0300") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19987 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228940 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Why do you think what they do is "correct"? AFAIK, we use the Unicode > Standard's definition of Emoji sequences to decide when U+FE0F > warrants an Emoji representation. maybe those other applications > default to Emoji representation of every character that can possibly > have such a representation, but in Emacs such a default cannot make > sense. I don't know whether or not their behavior is correct, but this sequence is seen in the wild (for example, the Mac OS input methods generate these sequences), so maybe it is worth supporting.