From: sbaugh@catern.com
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Cc: 62700@debbugs.gnu.org, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
Subject: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 21:02:47 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfdbmmmh.fsf@catern.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86h6tr4pi8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2023 19:37:51 +0300")
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
> Changing the API will definitely cause problems with backwards-compatibility.
> But maybe you could find a simple heuristic that would decide what base-suffix
> to set in minibuffer-completion-help? Then no API changes will be needed.
Thank you for the guidance and suggestion.
Here's one heuristic which works decently well:
diff --git a/lisp/minibuffer.el b/lisp/minibuffer.el
index 21d4607e7cf..dfb06b5b88f 100644
--- a/lisp/minibuffer.el
+++ b/lisp/minibuffer.el
@@ -2374,7 +2374,11 @@ minibuffer-completion-help
(prefix (unless (zerop base-size) (substring string 0 base-size)))
(base-prefix (buffer-substring (minibuffer--completion-prompt-end)
(+ start base-size)))
- (base-suffix (buffer-substring (point) (point-max)))
+ (base-suffix
+ (if (eq (alist-get 'category (cdr md)) 'file)
+ (buffer-substring (save-excursion (search-forward "/" nil t) (point))
+ (point-max))
+ ""))
(all-md (completion--metadata (buffer-substring-no-properties
start (point))
base-size md
The reasoning here is that if completion returns the full string which
should be in the minibuffer, then we should replace the minibuffer with
that string, so base-suffix should be "". But if we're completing only
part of the string, base-suffix should be something else. AFAIK only
file completion falls into the latter category, and it always completes
just one component of a path, so I set base-suffix to not include the
component of the path that point is in, so that completion replaces it
entirely.
I think this is basically a satisfactory heuristic, although I'm sure
I'm missing some categories of completion besides file completion which
complete only part of the string.
Regardless of whether this is a satisfactory heuristic, it's revealed to
me an unexpected behavior of a solution to this bug using base-suffix,
which may or may not be fine: Point is moved to the end of the
completion inserted.
So e.g. if point is at | and I'm completing |-path, then when I choose
the completion load-path, point will be at load-path| rather than
load|-path. This isn't a huge issue but it might be a little annoying?
I don't know if there's any way to fix this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-07 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 17:56 bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 18:58 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 20:42 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-04-06 18:55 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-06 19:22 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-07 16:37 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-07 21:02 ` sbaugh [this message]
2023-04-08 6:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 10:58 ` sbaugh
2023-04-08 13:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:36 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-08 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-09 16:40 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-09 17:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:30 ` Juri Linkov
[not found] ` <ierbk6lup79.fsf@janestreet.com>
2024-04-07 17:16 ` Juri Linkov
[not found] <b921ea5c-71a2-4e8f-b1cf-dd26831f8104@email.android.com>
2023-04-10 18:20 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 16:52 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 18:18 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:46 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 19:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-21 18:56 ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 10:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 12:57 ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 13:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 21:38 ` sbaugh
2023-04-23 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-23 11:48 ` sbaugh
2023-04-24 11:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-02 15:13 ` sbaugh
2023-05-02 17:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-08 15:48 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-08 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-03 0:58 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-04 7:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 10:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-12 18:27 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 2:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 16:54 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 20:59 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-14 17:32 ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-03 17:37 ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-04 0:30 ` sbaugh
2023-09-04 6:51 ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-14 7:39 ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-15 17:42 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfdbmmmh.fsf@catern.com \
--to=sbaugh@catern.com \
--cc=62700@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).