From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 19:35:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfbjknb7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a5xrzsph.fsf@stebalien.com> <83pm6nlhll.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8gfmqyt.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilcflbua.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt1rmjjg.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8gfjnzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87edn3mbr3.fsf@gmail.com> <83mt1rjg69.fsf@gnu.org> <875y8fm7x7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lehbjdjd.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn0vkqn1.fsf@gmail.com> <83jzwvj94x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22017"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 26 19:37:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bNT-0005ZG-DE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 19:37:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bND-0005Cj-4l; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bN8-0005Ax-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bN8-0001gc-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bN7-0005Jt-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63731.168512256620378 (code B ref 63731); Fri, 26 May 2023 17:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2023 17:36:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bMD-0005Ia-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:61494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2bMC-0005I5-1D for 63731@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3090d3e9c92so941382f8f.2 for <63731@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 10:36:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685122558; x=1687714558; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZX3scDC4kMLFA2tdmXnjGNmAjpUppkvoE/V+pmSoH7E=; b=dHonGyBbmHDGDfLuAQxEWm1EFNrpiatO4/Kp5/ABpQ6yGey+VQz9bzQ4Choq3cU3Kx PCliVj9VZO7aE07VmpNRAYGMisLCqOUJPmFWjNEDwhO3aGHQ86v4+C0FBNRtvlkg1plP yoDpbaMHtWvkkU+Xcmc46ejG2RIp/nQbLL0XAPC+LQsJ54B9L9udch2EJngyVCtF2yBA 5XMjcGL2x3ZPyqTOe32riS3/e1fDM31Fv8Le2ESS0r2wgKP2Zxiiz7ULwtBPQaPwgYT/ VbBbiJRUU2fZG/ud5NBl0iwZPzL7zA/7rzOluIYAh7hUrJ77bKVm9vMOtzBt0Dp9xxxN LXsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685122558; x=1687714558; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZX3scDC4kMLFA2tdmXnjGNmAjpUppkvoE/V+pmSoH7E=; b=HBji/rAhvQ6EK6ZLxWWqWzb1UNERzz9vY+KCtzN6rpSQvHM82ED95Ge/S7b1vxUwEf 8v+Odj64YCTMSlUnM7b16ltYw+TqnY5S7Gw5JNFUhSvivC+z5M9LC992Kp8IDR/ulS6K Dfqd+dmuSu0FOQ3OTz+mgDtv9B7gB/9aqHcjFGq5Dm4GJqR1Y2o+USx7xkSVtiT8iXN6 FmLiMU0Dh0Es+to0GeT4Qy4Yj9/KNUTsStfdS2JJDPob/Qj9dL+jvvVVNfGpjgd/zpjx iaJXFqf5HrFulu+C7ygwhgOdHaUQqnyPu3UJU3x6fG1syxMVzjWk8Sen3BJ9/HlZlNpr uuzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyPy0R+TUS/ryUu5NsGEBU/3FN7E5e+S0aUGExiA5VEjn3DJV2O qma/JStTMJ/13A6BvTnn0YY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ42hUiLWMKJ/+Mo/21ZREfND0oZcJugkFMbHFELJb3uQGx5CWXP3BqDFxpZ5hz2zv6IiJxHmw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:640c:0:b0:301:8551:446a with SMTP id z12-20020a5d640c000000b003018551446amr2618401wru.2.1685122557792; Fri, 26 May 2023 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7-20020a05600c230700b003f60a9ccd34sm5858574wmo.37.2023.05.26.10.35.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 May 2023 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83jzwvj94x.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 May 2023 20:27:26 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262447 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2023 20:27:26 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com >> Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:24:02 +0200 >>=20 >> >>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2023 18:52:22 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >>=20 Eli> Anyway, I think you should install the patch on emacs-29, and we Eli> should then try to fix the text-representation bug with VS-15 on Eli> master. (I guess it requires a change to font.c or something?) >>=20 >> It requires something that answers the question "what font would we >> use for this codepoint if it was not an emoji?". Maybe we can have a >> separate fontset that pretends that the emoji script is equivalent to >> symbol? Or invent some kind of 'text-presentation-font' property to >> put somewhere? Eli> I'm not sure I understand why we don't select the right font by Eli> default. Selecting a non-Emoji font for a non-Emoji codepoints sh= ould Eli> not need any special tricks. It doesn=CA=BCt but in this case it *is* an emoji codepoint, so it displays as emoji because of font.c, even when followed by VS-15. Robert --=20