From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64270: 30.0.50; Font update for no toolkit menu Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfadcjth.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874jmwhk2z.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <877crswf6e.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v8f9e60y.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <877crp8hwy.fsf@yahoo.com> <875y79e1x1.fsf@gmail.com> <871qhxe1h7.fsf@gmail.com> <87352d8et0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wmzpckck.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1k56xr8.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11864"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 64270@debbugs.gnu.org, Manuel Giraud To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 27 11:54:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5Oo-0002wa-OQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:54:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5Oe-00044a-70; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5Oc-00043u-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5Oc-0003TH-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5Oc-0005pj-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64270 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64270-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64270.168785963722411 (code B ref 64270); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64270) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2023 09:53:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5OW-0005pP-Lm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:50369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qE5OU-0005oY-2r for 64270@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:53:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-312826ffedbso4832843f8f.0 for <64270@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687859628; x=1690451628; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4c1lVzyRQcmZQcOd+4pxUbH8UApc4Y174URLIhfDI38=; b=j70QsobYw1M/JmHzDSIbBWKAQKCp8DahhX6XvEZhRsAwCPongXN7MVumKAGRhbB+ja Y2TGvJ2aX/vebFwQZUlOzEwP8K+WhKCIsTY8j/aWsJYV+fylylzjEN2Zmnmet8jB4tBt Jn5xp44FVcUD+dkzrHVk3jMJYeusOJN/LzS6qy05sF+NDqivrKrqAST5TKSPh2b5pekM ZdpRPHP4glgbxLK7qaYQAXWdnNQsLTurYjzUaZt2gSRf2+e09apQ3Ins4f9Vr1DEzilW p7gQdSRzCcLA1ZJ47fRcStA2qN3WC0Y2+xPGE41ig9vGV/MT0W2OvzGgGsfdMuOIXv94 tqnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687859628; x=1690451628; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4c1lVzyRQcmZQcOd+4pxUbH8UApc4Y174URLIhfDI38=; b=A6PCSshqTIFYjxcXmUEk8ks0TL/cqbsXUqx/AvoGKJIu8DXIrnW33nFo0QzR6vNHgx OLEp2d2RLJdLqCEp3bx/QB/i7TApgPfD3r0EkDTx4nz9R/apesDkqNAuOsN0IB4xH9pQ azHbeZ79lXq2YEHOc877H1eYawVEeDjtepF8zni5S2xmYuTkog2jIuE++0WGRCqBEgF1 blgswSOtaMLBRKRxL+dacSJBi9DBxPd9hj/w9ziWeADTO9npR2RCyBz3hj0QATftj7Pt 0tV5drC1rsJIzUu7rbyWB25UyAjQyL6j0aJVXtIn1KUSfR6JA3Tn0zGOoLPGh+kngZAm 6HqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzUQsT8aoHKv35ADyU+rX8dXojawKl0WyzyjRbEg8C0XgqoUw1j JdZMd6QTIK7MCiI0UX3eTKtFlMQO1fY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6CJJ9dcOoVwJ8tfbURj1xj8u26/l6IPlLTQixtdbvn5vMohxpegnJ+PxE+7rHZzFVuSDdWFw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:88:b0:313:e48a:d173 with SMTP id m8-20020a056000008800b00313e48ad173mr7322220wrx.68.1687859627765; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z13-20020adfe54d000000b00313ee3e50c7sm6663458wrm.97.2023.06.27.02.53.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1k56xr8.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:49:15 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:264139 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:49:15 +0800, Po Lu said: Po Lu> Robert Pluim writes: >> OK, but we could still fix this niggle in `font_unparse_xlfd' (if I >> call it a regression, can it go in emacs-29? =F0=9F=98=B8) Po Lu> I'm not so sure... I think it is more important that Emacs be ab= le to Po Lu> parse its own XLFDs without losing information than it is for XL= FDs it Po Lu> generates to be understood by X, since XLFDs are often used in L= isp as a Po Lu> printable replacement for font specifications. I don=CA=BCt think the change I proposed changes the parsing, only the unparsing: the weights are compared in order when parsing. Or did you mean you want Emacs to preserve the non-standard 'regular' for some reason? Robert --=20