From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 16:07:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87sf4buzpc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> References: <87o7f3e4cb.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83wmtr2mye.fsf@gnu.org> <87lea3wpai.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <8334wby0bq.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1e3wia7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67661@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , 67001@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 17:08:02 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzrz-0005PP-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:08:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzrq-0000xN-FA; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzrp-0000wd-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:49 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzro-0003p5-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzs2-0006yl-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 16:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67661.170213807326803 (code B ref 67661); Sat, 09 Dec 2023 16:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2023 16:07:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzrs-0006y9-L6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:46079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rBzrq-0006xo-ED; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4BE3200AB0; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 11:07:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:07:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1702138049; x= 1702224449; bh=YzuMQC+LvT6+gDHBxTbp9qBgVxTGNjDpWg+d+GcbSr0=; b=j PG+1x8B3UNB12fMmVejaWX5jgUu3IOGoTDnMyoGzCiY9fSdZcXGo1PxbQRANJvkT DKiP74rhE9BimfHGC42Su52SdtgrjLKMkUBgLaPCccXYI7XM9P3kvPbwYVaGKMJO RxXeaVaSejEYmlmnBFuguelSz42vnJipTw147ZUhV4YwMAXfnr5x1cxmyEehlNPz a9bWvLVFxOiQZx9+N4ANUbK5Gi8fa7msDLPP6OluRQmhkqOuGwCsLq5gM2ZE51Ck /YdccZYdRruHVxlmO89HFzdRIalYi7Xggtqx3aHnLZXIaI1aj6VvWFxf3Tw/nLH2 hiicpKgBge039ZjJUdXDQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1702138049; x=1702224449; bh=YzuMQC+LvT6+g DHBxTbp9qBgVxTGNjDpWg+d+GcbSr0=; b=bMX7KmQUNdMLxmDLpOOQRvIJX0mo9 voZi2Fy1roKaqg2nArKW4j9L25w5YNLWBDquPfTqUD9A+sjvwNu3pVe03qVMRub1 xJxJFYvqA2ty/2BtKHFvCvtY6eq0n2ixwV1mVg0pW5o0twxwinLrJ5IZgYlLe4E6 fNaxWinWH/wdIg0PLDGFBg4n+Mw8ia+SD49V5i7/SL5RCLsEIrxsxfzTZhae81Na xADldHSkZGNiBMBdI3jp8lBcfwImxIpS7VBG8bkP6qfku6AN/eKwd93ABr89GJsT NW3mrqU+Q1I6sHDmQTJmFns0kNA/OkcXqoCq0pPO4ul0onpzi+iU58KPg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudekkedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdttddttdertdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghn ucghhhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtffdvffeuleeuvdetkedvveehgfehvdegvefghfevudek geegleevgeejkeetkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i23c04076:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 11:07:28 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by zephyr.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97E269416C7; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 16:07:27 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Eshel Yaron's message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:03:57 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:275864 Archived-At: Hello, On Sat 09 Dec 2023 at 05:03pm +01, Eshel Yaron wrote: > Did you try with "l" before point instead of "ls" as I suggested? > > Sean, how about you? I haven't tried this, because it does not seem to be relevant. > I was referring to the specific case that Sean's recipe illustrated. > This case exhibits a change in behavior that you clearly described, and > that change is supposedly for the worse. IIUC what bothers Sean is that > both interfaces appear together, but the thing is that that seems to be > inherent to how `icomplete-in-buffer` currently works. No, what bothers me is the regression as described by Eli. I apologise for not being clearer in my initial report. Thank you for your engagement. -- Sean Whitton