From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67174: 30.0.50; [PATCH] What about a vectorized Gnus mode-line logo? Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 19:38:15 +0530 Message-ID: <87sf23m4kw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87il64mo30.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87fs0tc6xr.fsf@gmail.com> <87il5na7tu.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87a5qx9p5h.fsf@gmail.com> <87h6ipkawg.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11629"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67174@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 15:09:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rY55M-0002rB-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:09:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY557-0006L9-Cz; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY556-0006J7-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rY556-0003dH-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY55K-0000cM-9b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 14:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67174 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67174-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67174.17074013212347 (code B ref 67174); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 14:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67174) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2024 14:08:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY54z-0000bn-5c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:08:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]:50229) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY54x-0000bb-Jp for 67174@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5d8b70b39efso1549322a12.0 for <67174@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:08:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707401299; x=1708006099; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iTPmpMAfxHzCyRfcFbNrvyRSOKxZTnxZW8cZcQ2TMm8=; b=eT9MRAML+GvZ5tj0kWSC9hEYYZ8kssRPOUD9ksZu8uZYKeYDc6HuYEunvpyqwZKGww x2gxMwzmqARpMXDF6h6tlnBJ+7HZTs/VrZThuAAEGlj/DdlFLQjqGICh+m3PY3GanzJZ +6FGhGvJcxZ3GGCAUBs82tEcv12/cU82mSHDC3Svba79OwwVDbiLWlBt3LO2IISNyrpE DO7zmyC8pEiaIWk5oha140u2xpI4hPv2mrYrqmMFK9wj5skh44OGpUCPKA/v4xiKLUYt p6PlOQ63mFWciNrQFc9gFmU/DVvW3w5BltRAmoYP//PdPdUlmXi8t2i8pRFBLf3b2IcL 8IiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707401299; x=1708006099; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iTPmpMAfxHzCyRfcFbNrvyRSOKxZTnxZW8cZcQ2TMm8=; b=goxirP2U9v2BhxgwgyN+YhmfsoPTgWwVGpdq9m4xAfAwcRs3jrq4Iw4iCGUvYavHDO uxrfWCYtM78mDYXs3kHeS0Squtcyt/eY0KsVbwXAAPq0P1e5gtwFOwUPQu8EicH+2QXe efUtwVJLn6LoSicWoHF19BAxraPo9QRmiKyFDSEQSte0psEEMtRWdeal8aSjUZ2NwtIO yAAPId4K1ovYjMghRr+2sr5AUCUUa+DsmyxIBBcYTN7MQezqMuyRVIVNiHhomHcAZX0h K2ORTj0QpzVeZCodyO5UyoAv49v0wFSPyhiR22jNjvBNNSjJDICvzS0YoW/RRMsMsZkJ iVlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxFYuoBxt3vWHBAsm3wx0RZyyrVNAKmFw5D7QMZXLHw+aA69bEz TXbk99gNXYF3jjQtXxN6hcdgHzqxMZUai+RdmDqTXoYxvA5gUhPUDmQ63zuo2zw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0nJoGs3g7MtJp65kecNcB7sCf0bC4sCOnFO7NjMmbGkRtLPm8vw0l6Ud2adwQLM1ByjxHpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:c890:b0:19c:7798:5c84 with SMTP id hb16-20020a056a20c89000b0019c77985c84mr7110735pzb.56.1707401298814; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:08:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([1.7.159.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id it18-20020a056a00459200b006e04a3a3df6sm3697275pfb.185.2024.02.08.06.08.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:08:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h6ipkawg.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (Manuel Giraud's message of "Sat, 03 Feb 2024 12:53:20 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279634 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=A9=E0=AE=BF =E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=B0= =E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=B0=E0=AE=BF 03, 2024] Manuel Giraud wrote: Hello Manuel, > Visuwesh writes: > > [...] > >> That would be nice to have since I do like the little splash of >> colour. > > Hi Visuwesh (and all), > > What do you think of this attached patch? Now that SVG are honoring the > colors of the face property, I just add a face property to the logo. > > I have chosen 'font-lock-function-name-face' because it is a somewhat > standard face and it is of color Blue1 (#0000ff) with the default Emacs > theme (this is the same color of the XPM logo). > > Using a face property also have the nice property (=F0=9F=98=81) of autom= atically > adapt to any other theme. I know that I asked about adding a splash of colour to the mode-line but now that I have run the monochrome Gnus logo, I don't feel the need for the splash of colour anymore. But if general consensus is that we add a new face for this, can we add a new face that inherits from font-lock-function-name-face instead? I, for one, set every face to inherit from default and change some to use different fonts so I would still end up with a monochrome logo if I decide to have it coloured.