From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60936: 30.0.50; ERC >5.5: Add erc-fill style based on visual-line-mode Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:12:23 -0800 Message-ID: <87sf1mboy0.fsf@neverwas.me> References: <87tu0nao77.fsf@neverwas.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37301"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 60936@debbugs.gnu.org To: tzakmagiel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 02:13:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAn-0009ZH-PK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 02:13:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAO-0001nt-K4; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAJ-0001mU-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbA7-0006P7-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:12:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAT-0002vU-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60936 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60936-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60936.170847797311233 (code B ref 60936); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2024 01:12:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAK-0002v5-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta120.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.120]:39487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbAI-0002ux-A7 for 60936@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from filter006.mxroute.com ([136.175.111.2] filter006.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta120.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 18dc93898d40000466.001 for <60936@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:12:26 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 2b69a1ae7dedbc56bf804f509ebd2f12433a91054239 X-Originating-IP: [136.175.111.2] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neverwas.me ; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ggGEwxj2XdVyNsR7arGgd9UYRB8IxCrj7KI/4ysPcb8=; b=bNeQoObEvEdm8UunbNWHW7Dn/L Z4h035DneLfc/BLHQDlxvqSg5lqYNQspXbr3RBNpbYfY9q2c+ODykMV4oVeoWC8hmJZcwAimMBqHx sk8DORntqbg7h1M1tNruNRbX7WL28em6dA3fKBaQgWUN2T3XxuBSkbcrAgTXlpSgMv+/3BnXuQL2K H77iKyMLaJ/eqIHF+7mHjkxWf869Ect9nFiJpdtzJwdZQk4IB+Iom+qwKjXwJjOJf5gbIEZHIG9DO n+/YVlGbEqrMwF4QbROoCDF9Gk/weO5G5R7tSOsf4bEk2IppHjEXACG0mpDzZ7wuIzCRTYWSNxvwf /3yv/VKg==; In-Reply-To: (tzakmagiel via's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:01:07 +0000") X-Authenticated-Id: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280363 Archived-At: tzakmagiel writes: > +1'ing this the issue in Message #166 for visibility. I raised this question > under the nick "alcor" on #erc yesterday, and I agree that the default > behavior of `fill-wrap' (i.e. without `scrolltobottom') might be > confusing/unexpected for new `fill-wrap' users (such as myself, in this case). > > For the record, the behavior without the scrolltobottom module could be > described as "messages tend to drift upward on screen, gradually increasing > the whitespace between prompt and bottom of window" (This description courtesy > of corwin on #erc). > >>I'm thinking it might make sense to have `fill-wrap' formally depend on > `scrolltobottom', even though there's no technical reason to do so. > > +1 on that too. The behavior with `scrolltobottom' makes more sense (as a > default) and is more in line with other IRC clients, where the message prompt > is kept at the bottom of the window. Appreciate the input. `fill-wrap' now activates `scrolltobottom' if not already enabled and also reminds users to add it to `erc-modules' when that's the case: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=9668b4f9 Please let us know if something's still amiss or if the fix is otherwise inadequate. Thanks.