From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1504: 23.0.60; emacs daemon leaks memory Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:15:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87r64k3hv9.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87hc5hcg96.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1504@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228613446 8724 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2008 01:30:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1504@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Markus Triska Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 02:31:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L98Ut-00058T-Fp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:31:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40505 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L98Ti-0008FB-Oh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L98TV-00087I-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L98TT-000854-9g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42597 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L98TT-00084v-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:43969) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L98TS-00046Z-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB71UEQN029053; Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:30:14 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mB71K3DI026115; Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:20:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1504 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1504-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1504.122861255326037 (code B ref 1504); Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1504) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Dec 2008 01:15:53 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB71Fon2026031 for <1504@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:15:51 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D73157E1D1; Sat, 6 Dec 2008 20:15:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Markus Triska's message of "Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:52:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:30:20 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23022 Archived-At: Markus Triska writes: > When I do: > > $ emacs -nw -Q --eval "(server-start)" > > instead of "emacs -Q --daemon" above, it also uses more and more > memory. Does this memory increase persist across garbage collections? Also, could you check if Emacs 22 has a similar problem, or if it's new to Emacs 23? Thanks.