From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9761: proposed list-buffers change -- revert buffer if point is in *Buffer List* buffer Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:14:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87r52e89di.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318698931 25509 80.91.229.12 (15 Oct 2011 17:15:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9761@debbugs.gnu.org To: Zachary Kanfer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 19:15:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pV-0002OU-Q0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:15:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pU-0004N1-R5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pS-0004Mw-CU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pR-00010b-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pR-00010V-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7q5-0000xM-Lt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9761-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9761.13186989413649 (code B ref 9761); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9761) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2011 17:15:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pk-0000wn-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RF7pi-0000wb-CX for 9761@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([38.121.228.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9FHEpJJ031093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:14:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Zachary Kanfer's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:22:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:16:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52668 Archived-At: Zachary Kanfer writes: > The command list-buffers always puts point at the end of the > buffer. This patch changes the list-buffers command to simply revert > the buffer if point is inside the *Buffer List* buffer. Since point is > kept at the same line, the user can more easily see what changes have > occurred. This doesn't seem like a good idea. It is better for `list-buffers' to behave as unsurprisingly as possible, i.e. regardless of whether it's called from a buffer list. After all, the user can always call revert-buffer if that's what's desired.