From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10125: 24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order of byte compilation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:07:40 +0800 Message-ID: <87r50w47o3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <81pqgh90sp.fsf@gmail.com> <81ipm9l9kd.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322230138 13717 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2011 14:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org, stelian.iancu@gmail.com, Jambunathan K To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 15:08:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwSN-0006Iv-FR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:08:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwSM-0007af-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:08:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwSE-0007a0-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwS9-0005f5-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwS1-0005aJ-5r; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwTa-0008PN-17; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10125 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10125-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10125.132223017032275 (code B ref 10125); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2011 14:09:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwT3-0008OV-Fe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwT1-0008ON-Ej for 10125@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-6-203-164.singnet.com.sg ([121.6.203.164]:52888 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwRR-0004tp-1a; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:07:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:53:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:10:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54304 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Glenn Morris wrote: > >> fresh Emacs instance. There's no reason the "package manager" could not >> spawn a separate Emacs in batch-mode as a sub-job to do the compilation. > > Very lightly tested version: This uses the Emacs executable on the exec path, which might not be the correct one. I'm wary of making such a fundamental change to package.el without first exploring possible package-specific work-arounds. Could problematic packages use an eval-when-compile form to forcibly load the correct version of the required file?