From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10844: 24.0.93; Slightly unclear help text about remapped commands Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:36:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87r4xpz9tg.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87boovnpsr.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329759429 13659 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2012 17:37:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10844@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 18:37:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXAd-0005zC-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:37:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44322 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXAd-0006rE-4e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXAV-0006X9-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXAQ-0001GM-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXAQ-0001GI-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:36:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXCX-0004xy-Mu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10844 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10844-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10844.132975952819071 (code B ref 10844); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2012 17:38:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXCG-0004xV-3x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzXC9-0004xI-V6 for 10844@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzX9p-0006mx-KJ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:36:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:30:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RzX9p-0006mx-KJ MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1330364173.96135@t5yniFpee71ShF1oTpNmvg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57032 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Indeed, it's a bit confusing. I'm thinking of something along the lines of: > > ... > It is normally bound to C-x k, > tho the command is remapped to `ido-kill-buffer'. > > but I'm not satisfied yet. Can someone help out find a wording that's > sufficiently concise for those who know what's going on without being > confusing for those who don't? It is normally bound to C-x k, but this keystroke is currently remapped to `ido-kill-buffer'. "Command" is ambiguous, since `kill-buffer' is a command, and we want to avoid saying the `kill-buffer' is "remapped", which is what confused me in the first place. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome