From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4895: 23.1; Incorrect font selected Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:10:10 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87r4sl8i35.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <5f0660120911092215v48f00477l5f2c68855507ab4b@mail.gmail.com> <87hbt1siju.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87wr2d33og.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341822005 27324 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2012 08:20:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4895@debbugs.gnu.org, cmr.pent@gmail.com, Kenichi Handa To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 09 10:20:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1So9CJ-0001Zg-JD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:19:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55516 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1So9CI-0005mY-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1So9CA-0005m8-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1So9C8-00060i-42 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1So9C8-00060a-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So9HB-0002w6-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4895 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4895-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4895.134182229811277 (code B ref 4895); Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4895) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2012 08:24:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So9H8-0002vq-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:57789 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So9H6-0002vj-Fz for 4895@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A121B451CAC2; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:19:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wr2d33og.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:26:55 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61751 Archived-At: > Presumably, unicode fonts should have even better coverage now than > three years ago, when this discussion first took place. Any objections > to making the switch? Yes, the current situation is better than three years ago because there are less cp1251 fonts on GNU/Linux installations, and more fonts with wider charset coverage that have the same look for different charsets, so a charset selected by font-selector matters less now.