From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12273: 24.2.50; complex text layout Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:54:17 +0900 Message-ID: <87r4qshis6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <955FEE1A-949C-4F36-A66A-9E1777AEB9B5@Freenet.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346054125 21135 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2012 07:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 27 09:55:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAK-0000cV-6X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:55:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAI-0001l0-Bj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAF-0001kU-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAB-0008HB-GJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAB-0008Gp-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uB0-0007oX-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12273.134605411829984 (code B ref 12273); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2012 07:55:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAH-0007nZ-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T5uAF-0007nS-Jo for 12273@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.149.7] (port=61176 helo=ubuntu) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5u9O-00038i-Pb; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:54:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <955FEE1A-949C-4F36-A66A-9E1777AEB9B5@Freenet.DE> (message from Peter Dyballa on Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:41:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63518 Archived-At: In article <955FEE1A-949C-4F36-A66A-9E1777AEB9B5@Freenet.DE>, Peter Dyballa= writes: > So the Fink variant uses libm17n and a modern libotf with > OTF_get_variation_glyphs and the MacPorts variant has a > bit older software. I launched both with -Q and them > display the HELLO file and edited it to contain only > complex scripts. Thank you for the testing. > I made a screenshot of both Emacsen side by side and made > from the Fink variant's display a transparent copy with > text colour in red and tried to position that over the > same part of the edited HELLO buffer in the other Emacs. Could you attach an image file of MacPorts version without overwrapping with Fink verison? > A few differences are visible. I cannot judge whether > these differences are improvements, except for one: the > Gujarati word in () seems to be in the m17n enabled Fink > variant not OK =E2=80=93 there is a low "accent" moved to the > opening parenthesis. Please show me the font names used for these scripts (which are, I think, not-correctly rendered): Arabic, Burmese, Gularati, Kannada, Sinhara,=20 --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org