From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11860: 24.1; Arabic - Harakat (diacritics, short vowels) don't appear Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:07:14 +0900 Message-ID: <87r4q6e9rh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <349071341393469@web30d.yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347516567 23765 80.91.229.3 (13 Sep 2012 06:09:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11860@debbugs.gnu.org, smias@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 08:09:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2cB-0000ns-Kt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:09:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56263 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2c7-00048T-UI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2c0-00048E-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2bw-0000N1-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48853) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2bw-0000Mx-2R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2cj-0004c1-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11860.134751654517663 (code B ref 11860); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2012 06:09:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2bo-0004ap-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2bm-0004aj-OM for 11860@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.149.7] (port=52157 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TC2ay-0008F9-2B; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:08:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83fw6nw66v.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:34:48 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64224 Archived-At: In article <83fw6nw66v.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, but wasn't this discussion about the effects of > Ffont_shape_gstring on drawing the resulting glyphs? > get_next_display_element has no bearing on that. When a font driver returns GSTRING "abcdef", how to segment it into clusters affect displaying especially in R2L text. If "abcdef" is segmented as "ab", "cd", "ef", it is displayed as "efcdab", but if it is segmented as "abc", "def", it is displaed as "defabc". In addition cursor movement is also affected by how GSTRING is segmented. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org