From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13422: 24.2.91; Feature request: Add a macro always expanding to nil Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:41:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87r4lqj7eu.fsf@web.de> References: <87ip72jnbr.fsf@web.de> <87sj665avm.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358034123 23136 80.91.229.3 (12 Jan 2013 23:42:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13422@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 13 00:42:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAiL-0001qV-8i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:42:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAi4-00033h-Pi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:41:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAi0-00033X-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAhw-0000OG-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:41:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAhw-0000Nm-9l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:41:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAiA-00051l-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13422 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13422-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13422.135803406219249 (code B ref 13422); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13422) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2013 23:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAhA-000507-76 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:50061) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuAh1-0004zo-ND for 13422@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:40:53 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.154.121]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MD8Fc-1TkDzM2V7U-00GbPl; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:40:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:15:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:McuDt6gAd9HTbtgLcp+Kr8Xn4EsH9t17XiDnwOaLlNi q9kMNpwCLNtZQ77bThiVnUUywjyIbTJotHRspuSFmBK0uvEl0W rnE/HaWOXYa6worHOSB2k3c0pTxH5sqKI3kNoDuFZyBKWoqX/I 1Rt/21oZ8pUslEQ78AtmEcBVLGavnL1q48agOghTEB1qU12pIQ o+jMm8MWLoJBpeWI2Ya9SF/ulAFvD6SRQLWjSklq/s= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69688 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > >> (quote ...) does nearly the same. > > > > Right. But it accepts only one argument, else you get compiler errors. > > Just put a pair of parens around them. Right again, nice. OTOH, do you think that most users really will have this idea? Michael.