From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:08:00 -0800 Message-ID: <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391821809 11371 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 01:10:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 01:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 02:10:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQy-00046L-E4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:10:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44390 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQx-0005ti-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQq-0005sn-2H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQk-0007kX-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQk-0007k8-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQk-00053Y-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 01:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139182176619371 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 01:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 01:09:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQ9-00052M-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQ6-00052B-RX for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwPs-0002a0-5i; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:09:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:39:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBwPs-0002a0-5i MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392426549.09788@E8JFsFsf0C3y8Ti3/Ci3Og X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84842 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when > a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to > X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, > which again involves calls to X. > > Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? As far as I can tell, no X connection was lost. That is, the frame is still there, and I'm not trying to kill and frames or anything. This is in the middle of reading a Gnus group. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/