From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18009: 24.4.50; Add hooks for `rename-file' and `delete-file' Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:46:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87r41pvbe6.fsf@gmx.de> References: <16c1eba0-7848-497c-8aef-cf3d02f2decd@default> <874mylwr4y.fsf@gmx.de> <87vbr1vc20.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405244905 20517 80.91.229.3 (13 Jul 2014 09:48:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18009@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 13 11:48:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GOG-0003wN-F9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:48:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GOG-0002qS-5Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GO7-0002pN-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GO2-0001EY-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GO2-0001EP-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GO2-0002U4-1G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18009 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18009-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18009.14052448319477 (code B ref 18009); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18009) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2014 09:47:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GNC-0002Sn-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:47:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:59843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6GNB-0002SX-8l for 18009@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.202.55.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLfH9-1X5zOA1BvH-000qe7; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:47:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:38:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hyrDPXKL3CJGNCXTNHwBF7WA/81UUH1fi66xRee5wn+sO/UNCne 6OY3HJZYULdjGA4SKVEPWUCyYqZeSBWyN1S/w6zfwXJu7TgMeFb5uSon870qJbYHeG3Vqgq ETt0Cqca+Fgcc50gzuUDaE8QPd/EWmj1927XJJi5JWg6c4Z9cj5xIb1fwVsPNtm/zRuDM3i Gqi6w/ncqwYv2sZQkVMFw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91498 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Michael Albinus writes: > >> I'll still don't understand. File name handlers are intended to provide >> a *different* implementation. > > Are they? Yes. And they are invoked only when the file *name* matches a given regexp. Drew hasn't mentioned this. >> And even if he goes this way, he would loose existing file name >> handlers, for example from Tramp. > > There is not necessarily the case. Of course, you could write a file name handler which would reinvoke other file name handlers afterwards. But the more natural approach would be to advice rename-file and delete-file. > Andreas. Best regards, Michael.