From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19296: [PATCH] Package archives now have priorities. Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:46 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r3w1w1wx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <20141207132244.A14A7200D1E@loki.jorgenschaefer.de> <20141207192105.48c4c41b@forcix> <20141207210038.384c7e84@forcix> <20141208115845.1adaa261@forcix> <20141208194913.10cf0340@forcix> <548E9D7A.5090802@forcix.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418645304 2893 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2014 12:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jorgen Schaefer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 15 13:08:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URl-0003C2-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:08:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39138 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URl-0003Q3-4j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URc-0003Pw-Ni for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URX-00006m-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URX-00006g-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URW-0001KF-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19296.14186452775085 (code B ref 19296); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2014 12:07:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URQ-0001Jw-V7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:37609) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0URO-0001Je-AY for 19296@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l89so8364710qgf.13 for <19296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:07:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=5jRmXMrqdvtWm/kCbupA+n0AFJ75AvINCozghdMj3jY=; b=XMB5nJahI8WPYZ6gshSqm/WRYC2zmkvZY3Lv8ywYTsm+PVGfSpYaGx85NK/3jr7dyf AedbAibDAdHAPShtHWf8ib/Z2oz4O5sDN9misZpQ22H4zYiBCm3tgvaKV8t70HgHv2J/ EV1Uro7wy09TIFDCCgNq2ar9d0Kypls5Z7TBE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=5jRmXMrqdvtWm/kCbupA+n0AFJ75AvINCozghdMj3jY=; b=HpoVaKSbOvam6Ztk8Uvzqxnl4/lCRdZNRdYGeAm1Nmr26D5ypAHjC4MZy/smh5qaO3 3RzRcKtYHtfb4DQIbC/vvaQRUZtr0C9jequ+AOuFDFzIYYmsJDSqRh2knLqD+s48GSoZ waDni3t9wxNvPYmZ01ZSSXCiMEnVj1+RcPwv+w4qYC2Slug2exULwmETtblVwSz5r1eK 9kyIrlbnDmb5AI4Z7wZLGKiBW3wKydQM4507+J2Gs0twzfQr7bCyW4MS1TGggFQ3E31X /meSHhXs2e9WXRKvJHUyl/sB8prFm2uzn2ZUzOIGBwmIMI0Z5hUo8V8WXngXnovtkz7/ xydg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkq0sE0cF7EzeWSvMayzVsIJ3YJtWWxEzEgre+qLUZT+06ZvNWmB7XL3w0+H66h2oo1Kuw X-Received: by 10.140.104.19 with SMTP id z19mr2387928qge.65.1418645268981; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:07:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e108sm10263877qge.15.2014.12.15.04.07.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:07:48 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <548E9D7A.5090802@forcix.cx> (Jorgen Schaefer's message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97350 Archived-At: On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:10 +0100 Jorgen Schaefer wrote: JS> I can see two ways for this. One, we overwrite the package's -pkg.el JS> file on install time with an expanded version that includes our own JS> infos, e.g. :archive "name" for this JS> (`package-generate-description-file' already has the code to generate JS> this file, and it just needs to be called even if the file already JS> exists). Alternatively, we add an .archive file to the package JS> directory recording the archive this came from. JS> I would tend to lean to overriding the -pkg.el file, but I do not have JS> any big preferences. Which way would you prefer? Keep in mind the -pkg.el file can be signed by the archive maintainers, IIRC. Ted