From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19046: 24.4; url-retrieve-synchronously does not use username/password in URL Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:38:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3iauxm5.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bn9ewcxj.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451072426 7088 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2015 19:40:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mah@everybody.org, 19046@debbugs.gnu.org, Faried Nawaz To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 25 20:40:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDl-0001W6-1L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:40:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDk-0005u3-I1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDd-0005tv-Qb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:40:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDa-0008Ck-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDZ-0008Cf-SY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:40:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYDZ-00086G-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed fixed Original-Received: via spool by 19046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19046.145107236531088 (code B ref 19046); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 19:39:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYCy-00085M-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:39:25 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYCy-00085D-4L for 19046@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCYCZ-0003N3-Nr; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:38:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Fri, 25 Dec 2015 11:36:50 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCYCZ-0003N3-Nr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451677140.29699@9utOzGxb7OowxRtSoQVVQg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110422 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: >>>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> I've now fixed this for Emacs 25.1. > > Should we mark this bug as "-done", or are you waiting for confirmation from > the OP? I think I marked it as done? I'm using the debbugs interface, so the control messages are separate messages, and also say what version the bug was fixed in. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no