From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22614: 25.1.50; ../../emacs/lisp/net/eww.el:29:1:Error: =?UTF-8?Q?Symbol=E2=80=99s?= value as variable is void: image-map Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:18:32 +1100 Message-ID: <87r3gi4qo7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <868u2s1ydw.fsf@boetes.org> <85lh6so6p5.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <87pow3oqgy.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455243623 7454 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2016 02:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wjenkner@inode.at, 22614@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 03:20:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3L9-0005JC-1o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 03:20:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3L8-0002Mo-8H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3L4-0002Lw-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3Kz-00068u-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3Kz-00068q-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3Kz-0001bC-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22614 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22614-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22614.14552435446079 (code B ref 22614); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22614) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2016 02:19:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3K4-0001Zz-5E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34825) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3K1-0001ZY-7f for 22614@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aU3Jd-0007jW-R2; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 03:18:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:59:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/ (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aU3Jd-0007jW-R2 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455848318.55488@ClIsT8vPIK6Wxk7d2sO0yQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112912 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > That changes the behaviour depending on the load order of shr > vs. image. Why doesn't shr require image? Isn't image.el dumped with Emacs if Emacs has image support? That's what I assumed, anyway... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no