From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22894: 25.1.50; dired-mark: Not remark a marked file Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:31:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87r3fql90m.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457105730 12495 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2016 15:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22894@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 04 16:35:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1abrl7-0006h9-Tk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:35:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abrl7-0006GU-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abrkw-00064X-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abrkv-0002PE-QS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abrkv-0002P1-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abrkv-0000Jh-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:35:05 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:35:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22894 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22894-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22894.1457105649664 (code B ref 22894); Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:35:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2016 15:34:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abrk1-0000Ae-FQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abrjz-0000AV-Oj for 22894@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.35.31.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.35.31] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1abrjH-0004PL-3S; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:33:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:09:39 +0900 (JST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1abrjH-0004PL-3S MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1457710403.43388@pfWz2qmUOG1ZA+oP9DsrnA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114397 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: > Marking many files using several markers may need some time, with > some regexp gimnastics. Its a pity if someone accidentaly change > one of the marks. For instance, using `dired-mark-files-in-region', > the last/first file in the region could be included unintentionally > changing the mark of one file. > > I'm not sure if allow 1) or to ban it. > I'm not sure if someone find this thread useful either :-) You're right. :-) I think if the user tries to change the marks in a region, then the marks in the region should be changed. So I'm not sure I understand the use case at all... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no