From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)" Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3doz8d5.fsf@gnus.org> References: <0FF2F801815441C3B5385CE3202E16A0@us.oracle.com> <878tzx2vth.fsf@gnus.org>> <87oa8sy6rt.fsf@web.de> <87bn4sbnxt.fsf@gnus.org>> <83h9ekwpqj.fsf@gnu.org>> <004a0fd2-c18c-481e-85c2-2a67ea4cd728@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461947446 5779 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 16:30:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 14086@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 18:30:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awBJK-00006f-9w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:30:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awBJG-00009x-JR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awBJ3-0008FC-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awBIr-0005eW-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awBIr-0005c4-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBIo-0003BK-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14086 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14086.146194737012155 (code B ref 14086); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 16:29:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBII-00039z-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBIH-00039r-4F for 14086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBIE-0007xM-Dp; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:29:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <004a0fd2-c18c-481e-85c2-2a67ea4cd728@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:26:52 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117214 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > Dunno how anyone could argue that this is not a bug. > AFAICT, there is no shadowing going on here (in the > example given). It might be because you provided no reproducible test case in your bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no