From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31376: 26.0.50; print-charset-text-property not honored Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 14:29:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87r2mfjtnd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d0y7ew2h.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87603zmxna.fsf@gmail.com> <83mux6nws8.fsf@gnu.org> <837eoani9b.fsf@gnu.org> <871seglk1y.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2mflgkh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526236146 26092 195.159.176.226 (13 May 2018 18:29:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31376@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 13 20:29:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvjx-0006gc-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 20:29:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvm4-0002sg-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57757) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvlx-0002YJ-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvlu-0006tA-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvlu-0006t3-7l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvlu-0000qU-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31376 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 31376-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31376.15262362083186 (code B ref 31376); Sun, 13 May 2018 18:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2018 18:30:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvl1-0000pJ-R1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:35375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fHvl0-0000nY-76 for 31376@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 14:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id q72-v6so8065766itc.0 for <31376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 13 May 2018 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+34RTGj19qFYp4JshryrMjPNimy8K2F+xkbaGxCrkIc=; b=My4XRi/rRaTY305JailmMhSSVNpDUIHqcPQp+0LqLzRwsjVtOfGLSfe53lOwoqooma TRI7bu9R+Bd9jl2SdYlDJG/3u8AViSARH3AUzGDNJhF8mCnFuvfQAIxXbT24fXGgyueK mMjdiQfF7cW7w4ftd4s/jqH9EofcaZSJNaxwB1XLN4krm1u0I44eTdcxulBewQBAzD1x L6D8xpAgGNA7vcypkS8EY0f267mTIZgzJzjd63AvQl9vf02FVmmzbmjmIPsmoT5B1Uq5 KbFaWqaE9ZMRAQ7WrIDVbFzvsMIFBo70l2nifRZfreWKn948xzjBJ/w3f5nP3MfQ9LVA i2bw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+34RTGj19qFYp4JshryrMjPNimy8K2F+xkbaGxCrkIc=; b=AroyuolB6dvbX0xgCL6n4lUjeXkvw7FgLgE0W8PgrY52KDJdm1R1bTsp8hajsZ+Zdn 0W0cdekSFOdU5UNjMRMRIJweifz5g3GrjbbmNrymhi/DuwaICvcQZwf0duQqc43f1uM1 +P8ffguaPgN29PfSOiiTnQE0MEWJKDWozmbGM19Vtx6CW3haXxSmVGOIT0uckp4qf0yF jwGmwkmnFKFC6LkpGAKVF4E2qODOoB7vO6jto2wGj3msW08bQGSOt08liYPJn8iAcJMJ zjPUievF4eOuigaUAjz2y4fxPtRzxOeucu6VIeBu+GKj9wwkz6zDVsX4jZdV2E+/Oy6F 7eTg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc6pq58aU2gNyka6T3ThOJbrNJmaUwzasZhJjrz4/7CsI5SBpB8 tHxlm/L9HA7XjMg4gIHOZto= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpB6QpxkNdBbKX6hbAInJ3sD/S2zPL60nnSjVEvUUOX2hb0FTorzR2Aqk/7SSUrGRdnO7TBFA== X-Received: by 2002:a24:63ca:: with SMTP id j193-v6mr6920513itc.66.1526236200654; Sun, 13 May 2018 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p4-v6sm3146342itb.1.2018.05.13.11.29.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 May 2018 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r2mflgkh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 13 May 2018 18:29:34 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146154 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > This LGTM, but the description of 'default' IMO is too > implementation-centric, which doesn't help the user in understanding > what to expect from that value. How about the variant below? Yeah, I only understand it from the implementation myself. > If the value is @code{default}, print only those @code{charset} text > properties that are ``unusual'' for the respective characters under > the current language environment. The @code{charset} property of a > character is considered unusual if its value is different from what > @code{char-charset} returns for that character. Okay, when writing up some tests I may have found another minor bug, or at least something which contradicts the text above. Is there supposed to be an exception for ascii characters? (char-charset ?a) ;=3D> ascii (prin1-to-string (propertize (string ?a) 'charset 'chinese-cns11643-15)) ;=3D> "\"a\"" vs (char-charset ?\xf6) ;=3D> unicode (prin1-to-string (propertize (string ?\xf6) 'charset 'chinese-cns11643-15)) ;=3D> "#(\"=C3=B6\" 0 1 (charset chinese-cns11643-15))" (Nothing special about chinese-cns11643-15, by the way, it's just the first element in charset-list.)