From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33301: 27.0.50; broken elisp indentation for non-definition symbols starting with "def.." Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:28:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87r2fuh1tm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zhukh1ri.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvksv21u.fsf@web.de> <87efbvrj4c.fsf@gmail.com> <8736sbumzj.fsf@web.de> <87a7mjqdym.fsf@gmail.com> <877ehnowgy.fsf@web.de> <875zx6r5a3.fsf@gmail.com> <87efbumvd0.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541766489 18056 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2018 12:28:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:28:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33301@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 09 13:28:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5tM-0004ab-M7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 13:28:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5vT-00011F-8Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5vN-0000yw-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5vI-0006Id-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5vH-0006IT-Vq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5vG-0001GH-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:30:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33301 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 33301-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33301.15417665444741 (code B ref 33301); Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33301) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2018 12:29:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5uI-0001EO-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it1-f177.google.com ([209.85.166.177]:34627) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gL5uG-0001Dp-W5 for 33301@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:29:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it1-f177.google.com with SMTP id t189-v6so4332862itf.1 for <33301@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 04:29:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h9QvRkOPRvA4ZRQrb0zyoEWZsv1bz/9Qyosofny8jZY=; b=NIqT7s/1c8/RdOxSdTxkwar3In1azWwYl0S0sfV+RdQK+hycanWRYyAgnBwFe/WW+n 2B7hQ1fkAT41a2Vs3raLswUlJz1G4T2lcxo/ukvXe7r7ZVCPt1Siwm87z6VxxF08Eng/ gh1zG27p9sxfcoZGcmQ/C45c0zHrmEP8ZAAidKfqTu+AZ2aJzg9o/X1XNxbF7klgyqa5 14IjJ1K+Q2CyDZyCJrMmmroH9B+LQWIaGvFnhHJ+M+XHkmnfCqL1A23rwxIvWJT4JmYH vO6gh9nU9lFsE/4od5QRC7KLgNd6VtPmqL+1C7YhPf2+prHXmlxJuu+l+iX15ppGYYwq AXNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h9QvRkOPRvA4ZRQrb0zyoEWZsv1bz/9Qyosofny8jZY=; b=NXqGmjIlsJgfTWDKnngy6boA8DLQi6uAW6VlNo/1SQoHUGhPwTWOnwpEHU73HXPsT4 TgSsAT7+2LIbzk0cVv8ILbxUBzn1SFiziT/nyQaFnD6JJ0MI3bafyqmZgZphwxP34BD3 qjebfMeAkM/3kmljz8enDMxIVayBZH+O2BdTtFjHS/boJW23/UfZw5IDDNTH58Heg2eR Z5qIOFxDs3yZkdyEuv9sUo6dQOqwtQrMDFFO5tFPvKKYS9xV+Iv3BxI26FFyJZql5gVA qTjHJRYHsXj/e5+FW2Z7SApdvtTCs0L+Q7SbhpkWCEASJukRaM2hgZ23tImq27to7SJH YsXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJWQ4PNqVawzXm9OcO1Qm8UFFkEuTY0AjvX1jpxnj16FOye/OOy JzElsdV7bJho6JaRILNZ0eJhUUpy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5enXD1PwOlk8BVlAt8YQEgQ04JQhNVcnqa5GhLBBAZrej9MLJDkBNBXR0lqz50U2CKjrN5rOA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9b46:: with SMTP id g6-v6mr7696275jal.60.1541766535284; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 04:28:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o69-v6sm644583itb.4.2018.11.09.04.28.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Nov 2018 04:28:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87efbumvd0.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:51:55 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152214 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > >> OK, just add (derived-mode-p 'emacs-lisp-mode), as is done elsewhere >> in that file. > > I think we could do that, but I don't feel qualified to decide. Maybe > Noam can help. I think it would be acceptable. > As far as the example in your bug report is concerned, I think it would > also be an improvement if elisp-mode wouldn't try be clever in such a > way when indenting branches in a cond or variable associations in a let. The problem is that we currently don't have any way of specifying indentation for subforms of macro arguments, which is also the core problem of the other bugs I mentioned about indentation of cl-flet and friends.