From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35443: 27.0.50; Gnus (nnimap) shows "ghost" messages in summary buffer Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:27:10 -0700 Message-ID: <87r27ly49t.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87wojfjxry.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h8ajjhux.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfztiqu3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s1735ec.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87ftpn75bv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="19895"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35443@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 22 18:28:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1heis6-000514-Ub for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 18:28:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heis5-0005SI-8U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heirz-0005S0-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heiry-0004DD-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heiry-0004Co-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heiry-0005nJ-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 16:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35443 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35443-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35443.156122084822210 (code B ref 35443); Sat, 22 Jun 2019 16:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35443) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2019 16:27:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heirQ-0005m9-Ce for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:38866 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heirO-0005lr-6K for 35443@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [172.92.212.120]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ED00FA648; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2019 14:26:04 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161041 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >>> Maybe drop the extra FETCH responses for now, and add proper bookkeeping >>> later when implementing the requested feature? >> >> Okay, I'll work something up in the next week that goes halfway with >> this. > > Did you get any further in fixing this nnimap parsing bug? No I didn't! I looked at it for a while, had an internal conflict about just dropping the lines vs actually doing something with them, imagined all the work that would go into a more fully-featured parser, then got distracted and forgot about it. I still hope that in some distant future we could have a real parser consuming these buffers. So far as I know the only in-emacs options are in cedet -- wisent and the other one -- but I've never been able to make them work. And now it sounds like cedet might not even stay in-tree? Anyway, I'll make a real todo for dropping the lines, though it seems a shame... Eric