From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36903: 27.0.50; gnus registry vs. debbugs Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 16:34:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87r25rz36l.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87pnlmen9q.fsf@web.de> <87zhkqw965.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhkpq0az.fsf@web.de> <87ef21wzrm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r261pwi6.fsf@web.de> <87tvaxvfxc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pnllvera.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfw497re.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87blx0afpv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="237927"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36903@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 01:36:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNg-000zlN-I6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:36:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42122 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNf-0000FU-JE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNa-0000FC-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNZ-0003fL-QD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNZ-0003fD-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxNZ-0000kE-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36903 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36903-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36903.15655665062774 (code B ref 36903); Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36903) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2019 23:35:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45897 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxMg-0000ig-7E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:34144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxMe-0000iX-0v for 36903@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from 107-182-45-44.volcanocom.com ([107.182.45.44] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hwxMa-0007qW-K1; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:35:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87blx0afpv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:22:04 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164896 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > It seems like it has to be something to do with performance, so the > specs aren't re-evaluated? I really don't know. What do you think about > taking it out? I can't really imagine it being performance-related... computing the specs take extremely little time. But it's possible, I guess. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no