From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26587: 26.0.50; Gnus signs with false S/MIME key Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:32:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87r241kb4y.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fuh22dk6.fsf@wilson.bronger.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26587@debbugs.gnu.org To: Torsten Bronger Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 27 19:19:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtuJ-000uFv-L8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:19:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54264 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtuH-0001wQ-IN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:19:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEx-0001pw-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEw-0006RM-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEw-0006RI-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEw-0005S3-Fz; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26587 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 26587-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26587.156959837520929 (code B ref 26587); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 15:32:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEp-0005RS-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:32:55 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:33878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEm-0005RF-SF for 26587@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsEg-00038e-5P; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:32:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fuh22dk6.fsf@wilson.bronger.org> (Torsten Bronger's message of "Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:41:13 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167425 Archived-At: Torsten Bronger writes: > If I have keys for different email addresses in my gpgsm keyring, Gnus > signs an outgoing email using S/MIME with the first one listed by "gpgsm > --list-secret-keys" instead of the one actually associated with the > "From:" mail address. I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Could you describe, step by step, how you are composing the message to be signed? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no