From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20020: 25.0.50; `info-display-manual' should reuse existing window where buffer is displayed Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:22:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87r23ga4kc.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87h84iwtsr.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezlvoyn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wodd7qou.fsf@gnus.org> <831rvlvljs.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9svn1rx.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2xrprlw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="250942"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 20020@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 13 20:23:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWN-0013Aa-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:23:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41368 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWM-0005BD-5a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWF-0005Ax-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWE-00077y-B6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWE-00077o-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiWE-0002SB-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 18:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 20020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20020.15709909569383 (code B ref 20020); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 18:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 18:22:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiVo-0002RH-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:22:36 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiVk-0002R5-Hq for 20020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiVf-0003rk-Sq; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:22:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83y2xrprlw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:18:51 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169133 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > If this is the change, then I think it should be an opt-in change. We >> > don't behave like that with any other buffers, why should Info buffers >> > be an exception by default? >> >> That's true. Off the top of my head, I can't recall any other commands >> that work this way, so it's odd for `info-display-manual' to do so. >> >> Should I just revert the change? > > It'd be fine with me, but probably not with Drew. having an opt-in > defcustom is a good compromise, I think. I don't know much about how dedicated windows work, but couldn't Drew set that up to have Emacs pop up that window instead of having special code for this in `info-display-manual'? I had forgotten about that when I wrote the patch. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no