From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20319: nnoo.el not properly restoring back end server state Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:29:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87r23flr7v.fsf@gnus.org> References: <86r3rng4gy.fsf@realize.ch> <87y2yazjan.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="134577"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 20319@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 14 09:31:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJupR-000Yn6-Ah for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:31:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45308 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJupP-0002WJ-JG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuop-0002T1-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuoo-0000K2-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuoo-0000Jy-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuoo-0005dB-Cl; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 20319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20319.157103820718725 (code B ref 20319); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 07:30:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuns-0004qt-Un for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=51868 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJunq-0004p9-JX for 20319@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJunl-0003DO-By; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:30:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2yazjan.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 02:15:12 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169230 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've now changed this in the interface function in Emacs 27, and things > look more regular now, but the recipe here to reproduce was a bit > ... long, so I'm not 100% sure. > > Would it be possible to upgrade and check? More information was requested some weeks back, but no response was given, so I'm closing this bug report. If you're still seeing this problem, please reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no