From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28542: Temporary failure in name resolution while quitting emacs Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:43:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1o1ism8.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87lfejcdzv.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8jeke73.fsf@gnu.org> <875z5k5yks.fsf@gnus.org> <837dq0gsc7.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8jbxoml.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7p2gbs4.fsf@gnu.org> <875z5hoqx2.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn3per1t.fsf@gnu.org> <874kkzf69l.fsf@gnus.org> <83im9eagm4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: bshanks3@hotmail.com, 28542@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 15:44:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHkK-0009l8-AI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:44:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHkJ-00058P-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHkA-00056J-Dl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHkA-0006bV-5A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHkA-0006Zs-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 28542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28542.160735223325263 (code B ref 28542); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 14:43:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHk1-0006ZO-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHk0-0006ZA-EG for 28542@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 09:43:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mtf/OSXoWaKopv1BMrVNjtWuQ41Zp48pXCAmABXYzWA=; b=prVIesVoUb0OgiykEUv76Gzb3m VWKT/4Jqj6D/Gwszw5sOyrTPrD3GjAEKvKFgjyuZhAXq2DiDRtsvbysB9Ehe1TvAR9ZtClPqpcCVK WQ60DfshIt30KLwekrg3y22keeaDLIU78CxLwcBjMX6XIvjBR5AZTaUyU9JWtCPBWp4A=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmHjs-0006UG-6B; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:43:46 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEU2BQg1BQlCFQ9W MBpgPSBgPh5lQyL///+IZ1FlAAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+QMBw4FOTHKd8sAAAFmSURB VDjLdZONccMwCIWBCYBmAKEs0KRpB4jbLtANet1/hoJ+bMlOyF185hO8JywBMrRAGAKBTFpkVf+r kaZVQyTxmgJReAKR5AcSqSVEtgW9oubVHmhAOJ4lwArwpIiB7ACiIXuzqchCA80lRFlCTIZW5DvV nJmrGq4AmQlfJSqw7zM1gJxapvBeYUjSpF1UPSfdLrk1fxYNoBR+ApBosdMFFLgCDBAF1Sv7+rJB J1ndrHiqfgFrIwHUaM7oKOpYZQCeQv+1COD1qJ4Kww5cjguoPmQLaxUV8I4EwLVirdMVkL/hVqNr K5IpGkCQQ1RQDM7pPt2XPHeSPsS3hTdffgD6EPV6s229rRo+kq9LT2vfeZnc6efoKval74sdQDxu nx9X2wM3on95OV/EDuD0K+fvJ0AXObYCuqPeD4AIkCyb7FuRnwyEuCC8B+VjsCTYg/E2l5E2kB+F jRcScPQFz8gEZDgs/xMKOjpwY0wGAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIwLTEyLTA3VDE0OjA1 OjU3KzAwOjAw1m7TfgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMC0xMi0wN1QxNDowNTo1NyswMDow MKcza8IAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: The Soft Pink Truth's _Shall We Go On Sinning So That Grace May Increase_: "So That Grace May Increase" In-Reply-To: <83im9eagm4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Dec 2020 21:17:55 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195231 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think it'd be good to have a run_hook_with_timeout function, yes. > Whether it should be exposed to Lisp, I'm less certain: what would be > the use case that isn't this single place? It is somewhat special-purpose; yes. On the other hand, implementing it in Lisp is a lot easier, and I guess I could envision people actually using it for other things, too? So I just put it in subr.el. (But I did not document it in the manual, because it does not seem to warrant that.) Pushed to the trunk now and the test case seems to work fine. > As for zeroing waiting_for_input: it's almost certainly shouldn't be > part of that, since it should always be zero when Emacs signals an > error. We do this here because this might be exiting due to a fatal > signal, in which case all bets are off, and we should better be safe > than sorry. I'm not quite sure I'm reading this paragraph right -- I'm not sure what "that" in "shouldn't be part of that" refers to here. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no