From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45631: 27.1; regression: message-forward-ignored-headers no longer applies when forwarding as MIME Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:19:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87r1mgj3v5.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> References: <87mtxq7xmd.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87y2h71qj5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtxn6k69.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <878s961hmq.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtxgq0qo.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft385v27.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87czybh5nl.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft36jj83.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <878s8qxn0t.fsf@gnus.org> <87turei1j9.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87lfcpsjr1.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31259"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , 45631@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 17:28:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1trw-0007z2-4M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:28:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1trv-0001MR-6Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:28:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1tkd-0004UV-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1tkc-0004sa-0A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1tkb-000623-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45631 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45631-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45631.161107320323055 (code B ref 45631); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2021 16:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1tjf-0005zc-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [162.247.75.117] (port=60913 helo=che.mayfirst.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1tjd-0005yv-Qw for 45631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:20:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1611073201; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=w83i1koEeUEBRRVw58boGH1aYn1XzrsCFPQlw6AmizA=; b=Wc+wXzPCo7uXIp6K3LK1xbjamc40xje0+EOTsWUTIG/RBLVVAIrWdYsha7zfVEfx4VHgQ OKXmdcgRvoigUeODw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1611073201; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=w83i1koEeUEBRRVw58boGH1aYn1XzrsCFPQlw6AmizA=; b=cLiOv+liYMKcA91fM0o34x81MJcAO4LZj4aATdXMwBMU/OMLdtLVviMZPh2IQAVJdQQm4 Gr+DAPvDnkATyK51m6ot3BCzYPOI5pAsjKYzl7+Ky4EuSld40ciK+eKhXTrrHfBEwHsH/8T ceVSNvqp32hG6z3kaN6MumoTZtqy1mzSp14Q4uJf6pH2YQkabfZBkUDvd7KCioVjJDeGHDV gweyV0pJv9C0653ySztdchYI2F/i3Wrz4PD3qTbXrpb/BEP7LXFZ73b5mhC5zQZbk12fyRf nkEzePhaHXZ9ye6rGg+VukNLHcG3HXrQKq7+I8xoM+vXF6ee5Fh+JUdk+CRA== Original-Received: from fifthhorseman.net (c-24-30-57-93.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [24.30.57.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0F8CF9A5; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:20:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 341DC203D8; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:19:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87lfcpsjr1.fsf@gnus.org> Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXEK/AhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAr/gSROcn+6m8ijTN0DV9AahoHGafy52RRkhCZVwxhEe0K0Rh bmllbCBLYWhuIEdpbGxtb3IgPGRrZ0BmaWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldD6ImQQTFggAQQIbAQULCQgH AgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAIZARYhBMS8Lds4zOlkhevpwvIGkReQOOXGBQJd5Hw3BQkFpJWB AAoJEPIGkReQOOXGDYEA/j0ERjPxDleKMZ2LDcWc/3o5cLFwAVzBKQHppu0Be5IWAP0aeTnyEqlp RTE7M8zugwkhYeUYfYu0BjecDUMnYz6iDLgzBF3kewUWCSsGAQQB2kcPAQEHQK1IuW0GZmcrs2mx CYMl8IHse0tMF8cP7eBNXevrlx2ZiPUEGBYIACYCGwIWIQTEvC3bOMzpZIXr6cLyBpEXkDjlxgUC XeR7TwUJAiGl/gCBdiAEGRYIAB0WIQQsv6x2UaqQJzY+dXHEDyVUMvKBDwUCXeR7BQAKCRDEDyVU MvKBD7KmAQCHs+7588C4jto6fMje0Nu97zzoppjJM7lrGF2rVnbHvwD+MgmGUbHzPSUrTWnZBQDi /QM595bxNrBA4N1CiXhs2AMJEPIGkReQOOXGpp0BAM7YeBnt/UNvxJAGm4DidSfHU7RDMWe6Tgux HrH21cDkAQC9leNFXJsQ7F2ZniRPHa8CkictcQEKPL8VCWpfe8LbArg4BF3ke5wSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Cf+EiAXtntQMf51xpqb6uZ5O0eCLAZtkg0SXHjA1Jl X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198177 Archived-At: On Tue 2021-01-19 04:12:02 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > >> Either or both (or neither) of these variables might be applied in any >> of the three scenarios. If both are applied, i have no idea which order >> they are applied in, so applying both is probably not a great idea. =E2= =98=B9 > > Both are applied. In all cases? I think neither are applied in case 3, right? At any rate, if they're typically applied in tandem, it seems like their help text should probably refer to each other -- this discussion is the first place i've learned about message-forward-included-headers :/ > We can't change when they're applied, because that will break people's > setups. So we have to introduce a new variable for 3). In case 3, neither are currently applied. The only thing i'm asking for is to apply *only* the blocklist in case 3. What setups will that break? --dkg