From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Vigouroux via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52537: [DOC] =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98top-visible=E2=80=99?= and =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98bottom-visible=E2=80=99?= (erroneous indications) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:11:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1ac954d.fsf@laposte.net> References: <87v8zp8510.fsf@laposte.net> <83zgp1ge45.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Kevin Vigouroux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29300"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 52537@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 16 12:12:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxogI-0007R9-Ts for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:12:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxogH-00009p-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxog7-0008V8-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxog6-0007pd-PL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxog6-00013k-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kevin Vigouroux Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52537 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16396530954034 (code B ref -1); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2021 11:11:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxoff-00012z-JV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:11:35 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxofa-00012m-OK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxofa-0007yE-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-outgoing-1603.laposte.net ([160.92.124.98]:58850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxofY-0007Zn-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:11:30 -0500 X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.3.4", "queueID":"4JF8Yv4t5Dz16Hmd", "contextId":"8915ca09-0a2c-4c5d-818d-78938a8b187a"} Original-Received: from outgoing-mail.laposte.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpnf0105.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4JF8Yv4t5Dz16Hmd; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:11:15 +0100 (CET) X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.3.4", "queueID":"4JF8Yv3WD9z16HmJ", "contextId":"fe1fb2d4-0d00-49d9-ad2e-951ad73153f6"} X-lpn-mailing: LEGIT X-lpn-spamrating: 46 X-lpn-spamlevel: not-spam X-lpn-spamcause: OK, (-100)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleeggddviecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghvihhnucggihhgohhurhhouhiguceokhgvrdhvihhgohhurhhouhigsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteejteffgeevgeegueegkeefgeekfeegtddtvefhffejgeefkefgfefgkeeltdenucfkphepvddrudegrdduieeirddvfeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddrudegrdduieeirddvfeelpdhhvghloheprghrrghgohhgpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepkhgvrdhvihhgohhurhhouhigsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepsghughdqghhnuhdqvghmrggtshesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrghdpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht Original-Received: from aragog (arennes-652-1-268-239.w2-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [2.14.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mlpnf0105.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA id 4JF8Yv3WD9z16HmJ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:11:15 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83zgp1ge45.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2021 10:15:06 +0200") DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=lpn-wlmd; t=1639653082; bh=mEhGEuWDDkoFoksH6G5+QHP3Pm54X/UCJICK46PLBAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=crQepq1GtZ4/EH8SVgb/1MKXwyiNM+oMWO7yTLP/+30Xqc69nlZ0kLaDJW5PWeQZdRP68B3kbOmrNvB6YmzOqude3WP8wNwjMnbUbUDZ157ulQO5leJI0tFQ8D+Lw4nPrbQo3PzOkFYHV9c3tOX5zN0m5dg2mgmP/Wz0NEpZmvFIbdOUZIvQLB5lVCO0hKcHUY8zacCuA8qWNOp72nt/Wxt1R/Y3YSqA0S1/DsTV1amTxIsMpF5DuoITFmjS6q8zreJELh4fI3WriVLSaGjjWW28WjjHaz1exOwVmqmQ+ox18Cg/84SDp2iqUx1In3k9EZlUlgxX3RDtLbaGDR8vhw==; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=160.92.124.98; envelope-from=ke.vigouroux@laposte.net; helo=smtp-outgoing-1603.laposte.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222478 Archived-At: Indeed, I find the wording ambivalent. It could be rephrased like this. #+begin_quote The =E2=80=98top-visible=E2=80=99 parameter specifies that the number of pi= xels is /the *top area* of the child frame that *always* remain visible/ within the parent=E2=80=99s native frame during dragging [...] The =E2=80=98bottom-vis= ible=E2=80=99 parameters specifies that the number of pixels is /the *bottom area* of the child frame that *always* remain visible/ within the parent=E2=80=99s n= ative frame during dragging [...]. #+end_quote