From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fernando de Morais Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54458: 27.2; erc-dcc-get: Re-entering top level after C stack overflow Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:51:13 -0300 Message-ID: <87r15guen2.fsf__2864.24959065101$1651245355$gmane$org@gmail.com> References: <78459EAB-314B-4122-8E3B-7F82685D0DBA@acm.org> <83a6da9vm8.fsf@gnu.org> <87r16m46uf.fsf@neverwas.me> <4DA2DB05-D902-42DF-860D-87617FBB74C8@acm.org> <83k0cc907r.fsf@gnu.org> <5A8EE4CF-6F5E-4119-8765-8E301E2BE935@acm.org> <87czi435nh.fsf@neverwas.me> <87mth8rst7.fsf@neverwas.me> <98F3182F-80A4-4131-8E9C-E1576908DF96@acm.org> <87sfqygccz.fsf@neverwas.me> <87h77aozgw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wng67xxd.fsf@neverwas.me> <875yng39sa.fsf@neverwas.me> <87sfqkz4ts.fsf@neverwas.me> <87ilqyrn9s.fsf@gmail.com> <878rrtz7or.fsf@neverwas.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34484"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , emacs-erc@gnu.org, bandali@gnu.org, 54458@debbugs.gnu.org To: "J.P." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 17:15:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nkSLT-0008k7-G0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:15:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkSLS-00043Y-DU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRyW-0001fa-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRyU-0001Sv-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRyU-0002eo-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Fernando de Morais Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54458 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 54458-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54458.165124388710142 (code B ref 54458); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54458) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2022 14:51:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRxv-0002dW-8U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f172.google.com ([209.85.167.172]:46849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkRxt-0002dI-V8 for 54458@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f172.google.com with SMTP id q8so8323154oif.13 for <54458@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=JTozCNvk1QUa2u3eQW6zn1vaWlpOPtZPKz9v1vOL3xQ=; b=LrkeWGbkXYl/JnqsCszRqWQgSNx0aHum1sLtGhrwppBuNwhUczHqxqefvMUeuQZ6ip JYLOqslNknpvvLYdPxH3xK6rWoIkfYasYLY6uW0/+2aeGnZHynce3K8dbWnmQuWosaLj Qpl7VjiC0AdamMBpuGKrX59Dic4oVQArTSBuSB0m3C8Qt7JrQumO0BnvARe3khHbTMIj FQhcRQEMLfmDj1BJtu4k8+KaQS+dvvHkEhqVcuKFDoS3ZQpq2e7NY5Dp1A4voE1Ujo6h g0xV5bpgc8/mBnBDSndonquuvle0pcSebF1/StwnbIiFe1r7BL568xSuOpdi/gu3fJUK aqWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=JTozCNvk1QUa2u3eQW6zn1vaWlpOPtZPKz9v1vOL3xQ=; b=xkBCvd/TqE2wUinytVTX53g7U1xiL1MtxM0oc61enDeJCLsyN7Dtr5Hyqt2Hq2Y2al 9Or4uduufjADy/xAGtBq9J9P0MnZ20K8tJan2rtylT3j4voKjdnkZ8kTNGICleiYHRTX m/D+1/aB69B/ZoRxfrs4PiB9dOk9pOEDQGeRNGI61+PsbwvVb8bccCCEfAC4slvaeglp L/O80el7t8fc1r2S+cuei6Uu2tbL1rWIus3UIz5v/V4JPEYRqvK1OKk27VQUXqwvi5YP /8HRT9uVqEv+PUt2jvyuR3k0FJVjUGi/q0i6YGH0tiT/gsbQdUm2t1XDb/JrdyJFOQrR L3Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cQf7vnR5pkY4jYOVKRuSdQtlNU0l+dRjAagLq8VkQVI0KUk1W evKeJsSuS1mIQRrJoTG5kFN4wASn+WYk+/NB X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNftL8POvH/BuRml7Nxv8nPUFqqQAJIPpP6YMunxl2KVczyzUdjNd+sIBfN7ShqgJyDsgIhA== X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f87:0:b0:324:ea60:b97d with SMTP id g7-20020a544f87000000b00324ea60b97dmr1716650oiy.87.1651243879709; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sekai.mylaptop ([2804:14c:da80:8cd9::dd5e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x22-20020a056870435600b000e92295f8acsm3034575oah.2.2022.04.29.07.51.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878rrtz7or.fsf@neverwas.me> (J. P.'s message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2022 05:08:52 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230971 Archived-At: Hello J.P., "J.P." writes: > Hm. And you applied *all* the patches as a sequence? Last time I didn't apply them all, but this time I did. Now I'm using Emacs 28.1, so I believe the compatibility will no longer be an issue. Unfortunately, however, I couldn't use DCC GET when `erc-dcc-get-use-subprocess' is t. The transfer fails and a message like this appears: *** DCC: file transfer failed at 0 of in 0 seconds In this scenario, I tried to receive files from another sender (on the same server), but the same thing happened. The rest of your proposed improvements work normally, as previously reported, as long as `erc-dcc-get-use-subprocess' is nil. -- Regards, Fernando de Morais.