From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pankaj Jangid Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46621: Copy line Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 22:57:11 +0530 Message-ID: <87r13gr4ls.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <87tuq99ova.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <07496A25-CD5D-46E6-8F1C-7BD29143F3C8@acm.org> <87o7yoyj38.fsf@gnus.org> <449B2624-107D-4083-AE74-989F39C93936@acm.org> <871qvkvft6.fsf@gnus.org> <181B4CC3-B934-45AE-A7E8-9AF2B70C302E@acm.org> <87bkum1eyc.fsf@gnus.org> <861qvikk4l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgi5uyr1.fsf@gnus.org> <86o7yl9oc4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 46621@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:ih4ZLoofDiB2IjP8QiY/VmzrWu8= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 19:28:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o449j-0005b6-SJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:28:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o449i-0006jd-3x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o449E-0006jN-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4494-0000Tg-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4494-0003Ji-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87tuq99ova.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Resent-From: Pankaj Jangid Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46621 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.165591884512692 (code B ref -1); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2022 17:27:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o448T-0003Ie-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o448R-0003IX-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o448R-0006h0-Ma for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:53982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o448Q-0000R2-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o448P-0003kK-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:27:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235044 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > But please don't succumb to giving them key > bindings just because some new contributor > requested them. Even if you feel you want > to encourage new participants, that's not > appropriate. (My impression is that this is > in fact sometimes a thing with Emacs dev.) > > Emacs has gotten along quite well for a very > long time without feeling the crying need > for a `duplicate-line', a `copy-line' or a > `mark-line' command. Maybe ask yourself why. > > Just imagine that some such request doesn't > come from a new contributor - treat it as > you would from a longtime participant. I agree. But please, maintainers, keep the duplicate-line command. :-) I have started using it 2 days back and I might have used it 100s of times already. Really useful.