From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:18:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87r0spjntm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm898xb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tlleg0.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2882"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 14:17:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZPp-0000Xm-EK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:17:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZPR-0000E0-A2; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZPL-0000DD-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZPL-0000um-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZPK-00075d-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168130181227232 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 12:16:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39238 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZP9-000758-GA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:42792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmZP4-00074p-HI for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:16:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id l18so10615408wrb.9 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:16:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681301800; x=1683893800; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5vahmZgYPo1Sr5o0m8du7USPOFAMVuO/sbf987ioWG0=; b=WM152rh7v1BQLLab/sCjDtbF0FOM53hkajb5YMhei2s509KoW43TzPT4umSYJRAJFY eQhn7sSuSn5PBVsLCE6GsO++UNtgHz5WcL3oOmXaFYf+eHaXOwQFjwYBVz3KZUTtN1ru /izy4MBPVHlBH5iCo2KtSid3adfRd/JwSVf+TSsU5ld1YF+pihbRMNAs7dfxozHbJRXo iNb9Ht//PAtB/xZ5JxH89OiAx711EyEu2AvEu/5xdeXXV23x1haW8WdFZVa88WuM9lXN /JjxI8tudFBTIa37YiGLNBSk1GwqgQ6EEFI9z+EbOpJa9dAriXO39miPbL0DAVzwmx5t LMew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681301800; x=1683893800; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5vahmZgYPo1Sr5o0m8du7USPOFAMVuO/sbf987ioWG0=; b=byKQnRA+21yW6H1it0hXLRXikKcIk/1j41xn1C28IsvGBiYxSILnYgMJW6a6kLY6Iq L89G21kBVfXZwjsAfRzZ5yrDku3EbJJKS/dc+5I5Ta8TSypKGWkqk6X0AzKKvcsOigQx KRme/7d7qShSg4JcsVSYWn71MPhIEtNlQUCi9yWZmnlTFFDoQQW3IikfxqcH6hXzPRTX CDwJvkIAuBtpuE3IfiVNfAB9WqivOpiB9YpOj9TcNWXsgg8Ob5hmAV79qNvsUr58by6q s6o8FBUZtRNLntZjdr9Yg6/5Eo2F8Mjhg/C9sdwBMmO56MQyPkVkWfLOpRc51McxOBHE AVZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dR8s1keQ9De6QY88lEkGHaRjspK8RtAjNQRCK1YeXdx2z6T5jx de7lwHUNQ0QgEP0ZUlp/kqY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZeYD2nrVq5JYU+qs1APBAc5Dj7wq+Di0APLdyg12yxPj+QaiWZPMs7U5DMx6FAKsbG7dylDA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e252:0:b0:2ef:b052:1296 with SMTP id bl18-20020adfe252000000b002efb0521296mr1670803wrb.22.1681301800398; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug ([87.196.73.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11-20020a5d680b000000b002da75c5e143sm17077270wru.29.2023.04.12.05.16.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:16:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:00:09 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259731 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: >>> Can we put this tiny patch on master then? >> >> Yes, if Philip and Stefan don't object. But, since there will be a >> command for updating core packages, doesn't this go against your >> desire not to change the UX? > > After thinking about this for a bit, I think that the right approach is > to use package-install instead of writing a separate command. After > all, this will make the behaviour of package-install consistent with > that of the package menu. +1000 > It might work but it should be tested somewhat thoroughly before the > patch is applied. In the meantime, I just finished a similar approach > that does not modify `package-installed-p', but just adds another > utility function: I've just applied it, re-made emacs, tested with Emacs -Q and now M-x package-install doesn't offer _any_ completions to install, core or non-core. Is this what you intended? Jo=C3=A3o