From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63831: fix bug with failed inflation of .el.gz files in src/decompress.c Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 08:30:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87r0qrvix1.fsf_-_@gmx.de> References: <83bkhyawp8.fsf@gnu.org> <83bkhv7pon.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34469"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 63831@debbugs.gnu.org, Amritpal Singh , rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 04 08:31:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hGo-0008pa-7b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 08:31:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hGa-0007MJ-MN; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hGY-0007K6-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hGY-0002r6-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hGY-0004gQ-Bp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 06:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63831.168586023117965 (code B ref 63831); Sun, 04 Jun 2023 06:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2023 06:30:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hG3-0004ff-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:44251) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5hFx-0004fO-SN for 63831@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:30:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1685860219; x=1686465019; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=83fzw2BgngligVOfEX+7hdwBQ1mcTA6CcOBVFynev5Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZMGX9t6VQrRN2q5GOHGPiMJS/n6+wadz7fRjiQKE8EuoOZ6u7uLrgnY1T1tBqOuEmgfOV/1 GhgH8L4LV1UHwD+DmGSY/YjWnyUW8QGY3M5WXQ/3XYFLlknp78eBcibNljxuvMkO1RHzPZAh7 olF1zm28LgikzhsA0lqGu4oNTd6zRdjKlpdZLQ1Dx6XTtSya8OwKhYRCTYoZJBMUpkjEsTBtg YHrqRBG84bFxoUacC2/AH9DNeojyX5yBELVnvVZJnHA/fAMOcqe3yqw9d63s5G8vukV7mqTZt pE4/zwKfJbeFiGo8W4i04N3ZG6NlkHCgmGBPEMnstIshBrS/nwhw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.13]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWAOW-1pZHyz0PTG-00XbnA; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 08:30:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bkhv7pon.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 04 Jun 2023 08:38:00 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:h882+tnyMyWYQT7IFr3smesFu+jdTPlak4DKpkKT9Dd6SQZe8YV ctGEnaysCd/Lsoud4Cza2zLw/XXDSN1K+uQH1BfmQcHvBCyGdSQgfnqsZx1aLSgJQAaZmN3 b6ONy8jWfraFNVW60qDO0H9Uz+AkukTCHlZqLVrIHksxTDgo0TZgergEp0x5xlsRrQAYMkw 3SzWYSdncbnhCt9tPRpjg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:f3kye1KRX8M=;uW5Twpuhcmo2RWfISSmS/hZavQ/ yH9JEm6fPsSdU5zwXmLk12BusCKYZzGBjz9E7W/84oQ1srjVCjgvINQcjChZfKIwF2O4HExtI v70ugbMGbBMMi3mJkbZ3XjHrnkWpw4VoF5BG0RNOkeY48riADhervmQVIioMdeuJJAFDrAB8r VJwF9MAsxpN29mLounNEutQw62Qki1qttknfLJTnaT7YScvuXvNqTpRc620Bk+rvZebtMpRgj 4BbKTXTpIwbtd+rMQKCmlGHrdIZb71LcOUAjdPuPXh1M1rLozT8Nenpc6hjBRPWb3M3yBxBZz rj5arcwot1tyM0Ca7Pp7pIqGWnzrN8ZxZbqgxhgpysZPLyhq9EX2wSrqnKo+U5JJ9B84aVU36 EFVgoa0FS1UMp0Hb14rC3+FDpOwkR4OOkXzZiVb5Rlsmj9D4yw8WeeI5OtUoTNYwp4IfuD/GC eLhrXqj20Hs69yOhYSS9gfhyjbGEiSldhrl9oCxMg2gsoHrDqAAchBoFo/hShS2Fcj6jeR31Z jlr6uQ2HC4UBM3tbAwdIE2Itp4g7/aqxSN69qH2G1bAk2xBNy8XqiIGpf8IPtfVHLFyuZVQMb juAQfOHmdlckqinXsCLeCABRnSz8NkKaIxQoCoNj0fWlbiUaCEdWaqW4O5fmM0kw57YLSEdDk jCHI7bsAEfQXNGIFK81NytiT4qWmAdOc+L/MBZyvJaNUvXihn9brqz5/BxYpzoS1fXj1VjURf JsI6WIf3Muzs3ws/RLTA6oUxuQ3x9UsK9LywWPf9LGXh8U0w2dA9aHupVc+t5sH3J60LaFJW X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262901 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi, >> We've observed that me accidentally submitting a duplicate report >> made it through human filters, FTR, there are several moderators, so you cannot expect that both reports have been seen by the same moderator (honestly, I don't remember the case) Furthermore, we don't decide on the contents. If something looks like a valid bug report we approve, whatever it is about. No further checks on duplicates or alike, that would exceed our limited resources. >> I'm not trying to impugn someone else's ability of moderating but the current >> system seems a little ineffective. > I'm not sure I understand what you are suggesting here. What better > system did you have in mind? I don't feel offended :-) Anyway, what we do is manual, human work. Do you recommend to hand over moderation to ChatGPT? :-) Best regards, Michael.