From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61325: 30.0.50; Jokes in GNUS manual Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:10:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87r0nbu68g.fsf@localhost> References: <87ttzy7pg1.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13552"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 61325-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 06 09:11:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmgz-0003Nl-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:11:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmgs-0003es-Gc; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmgn-0003ea-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmgm-0007Sb-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmgn-0002nt-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61325-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D61325.169398420610710 (code D ref 61325); Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61325-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2023 07:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmfu-0002mf-7c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdmfr-0002lr-CF for 61325-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0D4240028 for <61325-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:09:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693984195; bh=rQGPbBBNPDlBf7PPkIz8CNYS55Voot2yQWJllfhGKUA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=Pc5LgqRMqfn0GX/Hg+KLLhIb2Un6+7DsS55bFs2cHFYJPp8nI2RIy4CaUtqaKBt2N o4ZO41EsNpL2AjEybhG0LGYArCxsMF+rfYxho2DtNToxTZ/EzZrdV5pf4O22H/YxtL IohbYtTYbbh4Syiw/OSdOu1X50RYjeEyEchI9jMuosECuFL7uzlQ9YD8rDfUy8aTYj /X+a0hQsu95o9XhZGiqtDx091YuV02hXuYTZO0uHLrhp68YYo8uucajVub/TRyOhYo pAo5WsALjFSw108KyA3YJVnKTF+xX0o5pHIHJCputb9YedBwzukFVGVxbMK+2adl3V 8xQC4nn79NKjA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RgYR66KQrz9rxD; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:09:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:269486 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > If this issue is to be revisited, I suggest it is done with patches that > are both > > a) very small, and > b) sent in separate bug reports. > > In particular, we are interested in fixing those places where there is > only a joke, and no a clear explanation. Agree. AFAIR, several patches have been proposed along the course of the discussion, including more atomic ones. If you can, may you please review them and see if they should be rejected/accepted. My vague memory tells me that at least one patch has been merged, but I often have hard time tracking which patches were accepted and which not - it is not always indicated in debbugs threads. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at