From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1133: Tool-bar and multi-tty Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:27:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87prm8uwzi.fsf__17024.5986003012$1223664702$gmane$org@cyd.mit.edu> References: <873aj56v2p.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1133@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223664636 4628 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2008 18:50:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, 1133@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 10 20:51:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KoN55-0001xi-Ce for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:51:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KoN41-0005Ha-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoN3q-0005Du-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoN3p-0005DW-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42289 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KoN3p-0005DE-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:46024) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoN3p-0005kR-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9AInwp9026730; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:49:58 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9AIU4pf022140; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:30:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1133 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1133-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1133.122366312321675 (code B ref 1133); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1133) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Oct 2008 18:25:23 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9AIPKAM021584 for <1133@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:25:22 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 912C257E210; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:27:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:18:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:02 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:21388 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> This sounds like a very complicated solution. Why can't we set up >> tool-bar-map unconditionally? Perhaps changes that make that >> possible are much smaller and cleaner than what you suggest here? > > My thoughts exactly... Why? See my other reply. I don't see any way to set up the tool-bar-map unconditionally, without losing X and GTK settings. Do you?