From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7522: 24.0.50; point after `clear-rectangle' and `string-rectangle' Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:26:27 +0800 Message-ID: <87pqt01qf0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <11F39F208FB54E6290AE378C52AB17C6@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292594004 27280 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 13:53:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7522@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 14:53:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTak9-0007QY-4d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:53:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59069 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTak8-0004Zk-Ig for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41554 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTajw-0004VZ-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaju-0008HX-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:52:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaju-0008HN-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:52:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaF3-0003uw-IU; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7522 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7522-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7522.129259201515004 (code B ref 7522); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7522) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2010 13:20:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaEJ-0003tv-II for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaEG-0003tj-Py for 7522@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (bb121-6-218-24.singnet.com.sg [121.6.218.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBHDQUsG001329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8EF2161F11; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:26:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <11F39F208FB54E6290AE378C52AB17C6@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:22:31 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:21:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42585 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > I'm no expert on this. But what is the rationale for leaving point at > bol after such commands. Wouldn't it make more sense to put point at > the same corner of the replaced rectangle as it was for the rectangle > that was replaced? I can't reproduce this. After `C-x r t' or `C-x r c', point is at a corner of the replaced/cleared rectangle. Please provide an exact recipe.