From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:00:46 -0600 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqe8kbg1.fsf__32243.0235137746$1327438923$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327438923 21175 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2012 21:02:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier , Ding Mailing List Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 24 22:01:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnV3-0004Hr-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnV2-0000j2-NU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48883) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnUy-0000d9-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnUq-000100-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnUq-0000zq-HQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnVB-0003Cy-OW; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.132743891112311 (code B ref 10238); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2012 21:01:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnUy-0003CQ-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com ([208.78.214.25]:40817) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpnUu-0003CD-SR for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:01:46 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0EAGTCHk/AqF0N/2dsb2JhbABCrzWBcgEBBAF5EAsNFCUPAQRJAQ0Fh3y4HYkmAgEKAiIFg3gGgzUEiD+SVox1 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com) ([192.168.93.13]) by cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2012 21:02:43 +0000 Original-Received: from internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.29) by chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:01:16 -0600 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com ([10.2.27.110]) by internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:01:16 -0600 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:26:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2012 21:01:16.0777 (UTC) FILETIME=[505B8590:01CCDADB] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55963 Archived-At: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:26:38 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> PS: BTW, please keep commit logs comments within the usual 80 (or even >>> 72) columns! >> I have previously been instructed to make the first line of a commit >> message be a complete sentence. Making it complete, less than 72 >> characters and meaningful is a challenge. SM> The first line doesn't need to be complete, as far as I'm concerned. SM> And I'm more worried about it staying within the 80 columns limit than SM> about it being a complete sentence. SM> IOW, just make sure that if you only read the first 80 chars of SM> the first line, you get something meaningful that describes the bulk of SM> the patch. I'm OK with the above, as long as the Gnus developers are allowed to go over 80 in the first line within reason. So we'll keep the first line short, but if it has to go a little over 80, we'll make sure the really important stuff is at the very beginning. Can we highlight past the 80th char in commit log buffers? That would be a nice passive indicator of a problem. CC to ding for any stray comments. Ted