From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Hagelberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10838: 24.0.92; package.el shows a misleading version number Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:01:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87pqddj9gf.fsf@hagelb.org> References: <87wr7l7174.fsf@hagelb.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329523394 28093 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2012 00:03:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10838@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 18 01:03:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXlh-0007Pl-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 01:03:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXlg-00046U-IN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXld-000466-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXlb-0001ib-6F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXla-0001iA-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXnS-0003Qb-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Hagelberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10838 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10838-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10838.132952345313116 (code B ref 10838); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10838) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2012 00:04:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXme-0003PU-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:04:13 -0500 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.177]:43208 helo=homiemail-a75.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RyXma-0003PL-Lj for 10838@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from homiemail-a75.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a75.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705935EC080; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:02:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=hagelb.org; h=from:to:cc:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=hagelb.org; b=tQhzdnkevmRf8tOGSymywTubGfW 3zZTuIt5p5FEmxHr8aU7KIONTzNzV6HRZF5e5x4ElKM9PQv06wKNORIKudzSMKRw Q/lwmo1YaAJsouxmg3LzTdKKFoM80lzLWv4czvgfjv13KGcVx6/cPUzgtqxrZOnI gJ5JwN8QnUNXn0Ko= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hagelb.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version: content-type; s=hagelb.org; bh=I+R7QpUyB/e8WanAZaxgTdGVboM=; b=1 SX+t+xxNJR/r3UhJ8ixXqKjgN/vuiRqIHMDuDDMWjTB6fKU7O8bCppPu+Pos3nA1 6bACWpv0zQXhJK9Rg+GjZnWkjN5VRVRzFu7WksGQGqLP11jutC2pSNGEAUF/hO47 8COjj9xGA1ZTFWGIPcrcf8qq4PvTsKR6/kf8Y2cVnI= Original-Received: from enigma (c-98-237-142-226.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [98.237.142.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: send@technomancy.us) by homiemail-a75.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E63085EC07E; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:46:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56980 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > IIUC the package.el we distribute is not synchronized with the unbundled > package.el any more, right? So it doesn't need a version number any > more (it's version number is the one of Emacs). If we want to backport package.el to work in Emacs 23 then we should probably keep the version number, but if we decide that's not worth it then it could be dropped. I haven't looked into what's keeping it from working on 23; I've just been pointing 23 users at an older version. Would you like me to investigate to see how much it would take to make it work? -Phil