From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6799: 24.0.50; Please add dired-details.el to Emacs [patch] Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:57:02 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <87ppzz6lar@ch.ristopher.com> References: <9C9137560F644E759AD573BBBD8E59EF@us.oracle.com> <65D921448B0644988BE6445A2EF3E021@us.oracle.com> <21FFB8EA85964411A9B790386C5DA3AD@us.oracle.com> <878v8zow44@ch.ristopher.com> <87k3sj6juj@ch.ristopher.com> <87mwxcx149@ch.ristopher.com> <87wqugmcu8@ch.ristopher.com> <87mwvbuus2@ch.ristopher.com> <87k3qeestt@ch.ristopher.com> <87ehgm7hmx@ch.ristopher.com> <87ip5tquwi@ch.ristopher.com> <87halc3tne.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361113102 31673 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2013 14:58:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:58:22 +0000 (UTC) To: 6799@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 15:58:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U75hS-0001KU-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:58:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75h8-0000Au-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75h1-0008Vm-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75gv-0007E3-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75gv-0007DS-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U75hm-0007gp-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christopher Schmidt Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136111310529506 (code B ref -1); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2013 14:58:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U75h4-0007fk-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U75gv-0007fY-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75g0-00071Q-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:57:14 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:37861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75fz-00071M-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75fw-0008DU-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75ft-000703-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:56418 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U75ft-0006zp-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:57:05 -0500 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 26C33213F3; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:57:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1361113022; bh=MJv+MOWCPMLcAtSdAI4zcYAkq3utzgVC7DRsw53VdJg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=PvrgOAbCk2No3sxkOUp4lp4UVuNLG0o5ZmKO9CmcJQ2maS7+LV7mMIx/QJUEFJjma dBCi9zffK7k6fHwKqSeMyXouQLD1QylWKD+70tGQd0wqjdY6IhYvL8gosinZvqMSPK 8srRzqwVw7qaTd3V9fz0SQXPXTIWZPC32usgtCfY= In-Reply-To: <87halc3tne.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:52:12 +0200") Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71439 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > Usually I don't do this but when I called in a dired buffer `M-x > text-mode RET' it unexpectedly removed from display all text except > filenames (i.e. made other text invisible). buffer-invisibility-spec is being set back to t. I.e. all text with a non-nil invisible text property is hidden. > I wonder should such cases be handled e.g. by disabling > `dired-hide-details-mode' in the hook `after-change-major-mode-hook'? Disabling dired-hide-details-mode just modifies buffer-invisibility-spec. This will not change anything. I guess the invisible text property should be set back to nil. dired-hide-details-mode will not work from thereon in this buffer. Is this a real issue? Christopher