From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8679: 24.0.50; wrong isearch highlighting for mismatch Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:11:03 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87ppmt9zsv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <066C4D0D5E9344B6AA56A2F57400BE27@us.oracle.com>> <87r47c7plr.fsf@building.gnus.org>> <715a78fd-35fb-41de-b523-5f86484a0369@default>> <837g91ty7t.fsf@gnu.org>> <1558a896-e67e-4c05-b87e-82ccd45bfbdd@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392149593 24986 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2014 20:13:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8679@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 11 21:13:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJho-0004hG-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:13:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJhn-0005wb-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:13:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJhd-0005wE-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:13:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJhX-0002P4-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJhX-0002Ox-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJhW-00084k-Sq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:13:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8679 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8679-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8679.139214953430962 (code B ref 8679); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8679) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2014 20:12:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJgj-00083J-3s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [69.163.184.122] (port=52303 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJgg-00083A-Jt for 8679@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.184.122]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB1932D742BEA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:12:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1558a896-e67e-4c05-b87e-82ccd45bfbdd@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:58:12 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85406 Archived-At: > It might be all we can reasonably expect; I don't know. Probably > Juri can answer that. And yes, in that case this is probably > also the answer to the bug fix request: it might not be easy to > fix. No one proposed a better idea since this was discussed last time in bug#14729.