From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Matthias Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:21:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87poz8lexa.fsf@winky.hogwarts> References: <87ziyd20cb.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447780948 2857 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 17:22:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21934@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 18:22:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxP-00043P-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:22:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxO-0000fa-OH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxG-0000Yf-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:22:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxC-0000Ym-S3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxC-0000Yi-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyjxC-0004wo-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Matthias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21934-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21934.144778091619005 (code B ref 21934); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21934) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2015 17:21:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyjx5-0004wS-Os for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:33012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyjx4-0004wL-9T for 21934@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so239201155wme.0 for <21934@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:21:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=nM5X521119L3NS4WijDI/MZn0YnU2IsuoT+TbOF/DLk=; b=Xg4HMSo6+OxqPDRMxw/1JLsGh25lWI/aJikwoLYTIoihtxtUm752JKV75n220jRU/9 lLQlXFcqDlFuHMN6vf3n1+1kxlL7sZllRs2MCkCW+kuJQAaHuysnHNCxGLFcCIRZ+ICS wnYX1GOzQppZjlCmZGsKVLCpOF8Q7QpwogLz6CKDSGp1mRcV6cqqOgxwTxooC4m+SIdR OGO0USFdNVkuVstdth3CDMYv67lsXDsdm4lAueRIXe3VI+ea1j00AhyEgaUbmPMIUJTV smr0kY6bkH841OHJRk3YG2ysyMoHpXuT0OD0uuOF2sIzbgwJjklIOyzYLYrGCe3Yi6Rk o9RA== X-Received: by 10.28.17.7 with SMTP id 7mr3758935wmr.45.1447780913717; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:21:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from winky.hogwarts (HSI-KBW-109-193-111-125.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [109.193.111.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm24956226wmf.6.2015.11.17.09.21.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:21:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by winky.hogwarts (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 15D3516E05E1; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:21:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 2015 06:01:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108829 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Eli, please take a look at TAGS attached to this bug report. Do the entries > there satisfy the "implicit name" conditions? > > etags that comes with Emacs outputs a TAGS file with explicit tags for these > functions, and that naturally works with find-tag. > > But I wonder if the example TAGS (produced by a different program, apparently) > is also valid. And if so, why Emacs's etags doesn't use the implicit tags. The TAGS file was created with etags from the emacs distribution. But I do not know the difference between implicit and explicit tags, sorry. Andreas