From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16390: 24.3.50; [PATCH] texinfo-mode does not fontify @math{2^{61}} correctly Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:36:17 +1100 Message-ID: <87povmlqz2.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87k3ebekg6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <68wqibh513.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87iotvz7uw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456285040 24998 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 03:37:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16390@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 04:37:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQGB-0000ld-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:37:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQGB-0003Ny-II for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34785) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQG7-0003M4-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQG6-0003wM-5d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQG6-0003wI-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQG5-00081i-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16390.145628501330820 (code B ref 16390); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 03:36:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQFx-000812-40 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:36:53 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQFw-00080v-4v for 16390@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQFR-0007JE-TT; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:36:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87iotvz7uw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:32:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aYQFR-0007JE-TT MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456889783.4819@tmEaUWKoW8VZcO6x17LKJw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113644 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Yes. Attached is another patch that works, but looks ugly. > Let me know if there is another more elegant way to check for > the optional presence of balanced curly brace. I've now applied your patch to the trunk. While I get the objection to using regexps to parse Texinfo, in this case it seems quite safe. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no